Difference between revisions of "Category:Jesus Survival (subject)"

Revision as of 09:07, 7 December 2010

Jesus Survival from the Cross

Overview

For some time, at the turn of the 19th century, the notion that Jesus could have survived the crucifixion, was considered a legitimate scholarly hypothesis by rationalist authors such as Karl Friedrich Bahrdt, Karl Heinrich Venturini, Heinrich Paulus, and others. The goal was to provide a rational explanation of the resurrection and appearances of Jesus.

After the criticism of David Friedrich Strauss in 1835, the hypothesis was totally abandoned in scholarship and ever since has been revived only in fictional or spiritual circles.

External links

Pages in category "Jesus Survival (subject)"

The following 26 pages are in this category, out of 26 total.

1

2

Media in category "Jesus Survival (subject)"

The following 6 files are in this category, out of 6 total.

1743 Annet.jpg 384 × 499; 31 KB
1828 Paulus.jpg 907 × 1,360; 72 KB
1965 * Schonfield.jpg 247 × 403; 25 KB
1976 Campus (film).jpg 280 × 280; 17 KB
1988 * Scorsese (film).png 300 × 459; 57 KB
2006 * Baigent (arch-fi).jpg 331 × 499; 38 KB

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Overview==
-For some time, at the turn of the 19th century, the notion that Jesus could have survived the crucifixion, was considered a legitimate scholarly hypothesis by rationalist authors such as [[Karl Friedrich Bahrdt]], [[Karl Heinrich Venturini]], [[Heinrich Paulus]], and others.
+For some time, at the turn of the 19th century, the notion that Jesus could have survived the crucifixion, was considered a legitimate scholarly hypothesis by rationalist authors such as [[Karl Friedrich Bahrdt]], [[Karl Heinrich Venturini]], [[Heinrich Paulus]], and others. The goal was to provide a rational explanation of the resurrection and appearances of Jesus.
 After the criticism of [[David Friedrich Strauss]] in 1835, the hypothesis was totally abandoned in scholarship and ever since has been revived only in fictional or spiritual circles.