Difference between revisions of "Category:Historical Jesus Studies--1920s"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
  |px= 38
  |px= 38
  |content=
  |content=
[[File:Giovanni Papini.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Giovanni Papini]]]]
[[File:Joseph Klausner.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Joseph Klausner]]]]
[[File:Joseph Klausner.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Joseph Klausner]]]]
[[File:Rudolf Bultmann.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Rudolf Bultmann]]]]
[[File:Rudolf Bultmann.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Rudolf Bultmann]]]]


The 1920s were characterized by the success of three very popular fictional works on Jesus--[[La storia di Cristo (1921 Papini), novel]]; [[The King of Kings (1927 DeMille), film]], and [[Jesus, the Son of Man (1928 Gibran), poetry]]. There was now a global market that included authors of different countries, serving an international audience. Among scholarly works, the most significant contribution was that offered by [[Joseph Klausner]]. His Life of Jesus, written in Hebrew from the perspective of an observant Jew and translated into English by [[Herbert Danby]], was the first consistent attempt to reclaim Jesus from the perspective of the Jewish orthodox tradition. However, a general skepticism about the possibility and even the theological significance of the search for the Historical Jesus became dominant, supported by the authority of [[Rudolf Bultmann]], who in his 1926 book on Jesus concluded that the only Jesus we can know is the risen Christ of the Christian faith. Besides his historical existence, virtually nothing can be recovered of the historical Jesus. The quest for the historical Jesus had therefore to be abandoned as both historically impossible and theologically superfluous.
The 1920s were characterized by the success of some very popular fictional works on Jesus--[[La storia di Cristo (1921 Papini), novel]]; [[The King of Kings (1927 DeMille), film]], [[Jesus, the Son of Man (1928 Gibran), poetry]], and [[The Escaped Cock (1928 Lawrence), novel]]. There was now a global market that included authors of different countries, serving an international audience.  
 
Among scholarly works, the most significant contribution was that offered by [[Joseph Klausner]]. His Life of Jesus, written in Hebrew from the perspective of an observant Jew and translated into English by [[Herbert Danby]], was the first consistent attempt to reclaim Jesus from the perspective of the Jewish orthodox tradition. However, a general skepticism about the possibility and even the theological significance of the search for the Historical Jesus became dominant, supported by the authority of [[Rudolf Bultmann]], who in his 1926 book on Jesus concluded that the only Jesus we can know is the risen Christ of the Christian faith. Besides his historical existence, virtually nothing can be recovered of the historical Jesus. The quest for the historical Jesus had therefore to be abandoned as both historically impossible and theologically superfluous.
 
<gallery>
File:Jesus Film DeMille.gif|[[Cecil B. DeMille]]
File:Kahlil Gibran.jpg|[[Kahlil Gibran]]
</gallery>
}}
}}
{{WindowMain
{{WindowMain

Revision as of 00:56, 21 August 2015

Jesus.jpg


The page: Historical Jesus Studies--1920s includes (in chronological order) scholarly and literary works in the field of Historical Jesus Studies made in the 1920s, or from 1920 to 1929.

HJS 1920s -- History of research -- Overview
HJS 1920s -- History of research -- Overview

The 1920s were characterized by the success of some very popular fictional works on Jesus--La storia di Cristo (1921 Papini), novel; The King of Kings (1927 DeMille), film, Jesus, the Son of Man (1928 Gibran), poetry, and The Escaped Cock (1928 Lawrence), novel. There was now a global market that included authors of different countries, serving an international audience.

Among scholarly works, the most significant contribution was that offered by Joseph Klausner. His Life of Jesus, written in Hebrew from the perspective of an observant Jew and translated into English by Herbert Danby, was the first consistent attempt to reclaim Jesus from the perspective of the Jewish orthodox tradition. However, a general skepticism about the possibility and even the theological significance of the search for the Historical Jesus became dominant, supported by the authority of Rudolf Bultmann, who in his 1926 book on Jesus concluded that the only Jesus we can know is the risen Christ of the Christian faith. Besides his historical existence, virtually nothing can be recovered of the historical Jesus. The quest for the historical Jesus had therefore to be abandoned as both historically impossible and theologically superfluous.

HJS 1920s -- Highlights
HJS 1920s -- Highlights


HJS Timeline -> 1920s

1920s.jpg


2010s (Top) -- 2000s (Top) -- 1990s (Top) -- 1980s (Top) -- 1970s (Top) -- 1960s (Top) -- 1950s (Top) -- 1940s (Top) -- 1930s (Top) -- 1920s (Top) -- 1910s (Top) -- 1900s (Top) -- 1850s (Top) -- 1800s (Top) -- 1700s (Top) -- 1600s (Top) -- 1500s (Top) -- 1400s (Top) -- 2000s (Top) -- Medieval (Top)


Fiction.jpg


Biography.jpg


Cognate Fields (1920s)
Cognate Fields (1920s)


Pages in category "Historical Jesus Studies--1920s"

The following 63 pages are in this category, out of 63 total.

1

Media in category "Historical Jesus Studies--1920s"

The following 8 files are in this category, out of 8 total.