Difference between revisions of "Category:Jesus Myth Theory (subject)"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
==Overview==
==Overview==


According to this non-fictional theory, the [[Jesus of Nazareth|Jesus]] we know from the Gospels is an entirely mythical figure. The "historical" biography was fabricated by early Christians, by adopting popular myths and legends of the time, commonly attributed to the "historical" lives of other gods or [[demigods]] (such as [[Dionysius]], [[Hercules]], [[Orpheus]], [[Horus]], and others).
According to this non-fictional theory, the [[Jesus of Nazareth|Jesus]] we know from the Gospels is an entirely mythical figure. His "historical" biography was fabricated by early Christians, by adopting popular myths and legends of the time, commonly attributed to the "historical" lives of other gods or [[demigods]] (such as [[Dionysius]], [[Hercules]], [[Orpheus]], [[Horus]], and others).


In its more radical version the theory argues that a person called [[Jesus of Nazareth]] never existed; other proponents of the theory contend that there might have been a historical character named Jesus but is completely unrecognizable behind his mythical metamorphosis.
In its more radical version the theory argues that a person called [[Jesus of Nazareth]] never existed; other proponents of the theory contend that there might have been a historical character named Jesus but is completely unrecognizable behind his mythical metamorphosis.
Line 9: Line 9:
In some authors (notably, [[Bruno Bauer]] and [[Arthur Drews]]), the Jesus Myth Theory was motivated or influenced by antisemitic attitudes, in the attempt to separate radically the Christian Jesus from his Jewish environment and to turn Christianity into a totally non-Jewish religion based on Hellenistic or "Aryan" traditions.
In some authors (notably, [[Bruno Bauer]] and [[Arthur Drews]]), the Jesus Myth Theory was motivated or influenced by antisemitic attitudes, in the attempt to separate radically the Christian Jesus from his Jewish environment and to turn Christianity into a totally non-Jewish religion based on Hellenistic or "Aryan" traditions.


Contemporary critical scholars dismiss the Jesus Myth Theory. Although the Gospels cannot be taken as accurate reports of Jesus' life, they are theological re-interpretations of the life of real person (the [[Historical Jesus]]).
Contemporary critical scholars dismiss the Jesus Myth Theory. Although the Gospels contain "mythological" elements and cannot be taken as accurate reports of Jesus' life, they are theological re-interpretations of the life of real person (the [[Historical Jesus]]).


== Major proponents of the Jesus Myth Theory ==
== Major proponents of the Jesus Myth Theory ==

Revision as of 13:58, 9 September 2011

Jesus Myth Theory

Overview

According to this non-fictional theory, the Jesus we know from the Gospels is an entirely mythical figure. His "historical" biography was fabricated by early Christians, by adopting popular myths and legends of the time, commonly attributed to the "historical" lives of other gods or demigods (such as Dionysius, Hercules, Orpheus, Horus, and others).

In its more radical version the theory argues that a person called Jesus of Nazareth never existed; other proponents of the theory contend that there might have been a historical character named Jesus but is completely unrecognizable behind his mythical metamorphosis.

In some authors (notably, Bruno Bauer and Arthur Drews), the Jesus Myth Theory was motivated or influenced by antisemitic attitudes, in the attempt to separate radically the Christian Jesus from his Jewish environment and to turn Christianity into a totally non-Jewish religion based on Hellenistic or "Aryan" traditions.

Contemporary critical scholars dismiss the Jesus Myth Theory. Although the Gospels contain "mythological" elements and cannot be taken as accurate reports of Jesus' life, they are theological re-interpretations of the life of real person (the Historical Jesus).

Major proponents of the Jesus Myth Theory

Two 18th-century French philosophers, Charles François Dupuis (1742–1809) and Constantin-François Volney (1757–1820) are credited for first developing the idea that Jesus should be viewed as an entirely mythical character. They rejected the historicity of Jesus and explained the origins of Christian narratives about Jesus as mere allegories based on solar pagan myths and rituals.

The theories of Dupuy and Volney influenced the work (and the language) of scholar David Friedrich Strauss, who in 1835 contended that the gospels should be regarded as largely mythical (not historical) narratives. Strauss however did not question either the historicity of Jesus, or the existent of a certain continuity between his preaching and the "mythical" interpretations of his disciples, thus laying the foundations of modern critical scholarship on the Historical Jesus.

The Jesus Myth Theory was revived by Bruno Bauer. In his work we find, openly expressed, that kind of antisemitic prejudice that would become distinctive in some proponents of the Theory, especially in Germany. In Bauer's view, the roots of Christianity are in Hellenistic philosophy (Seneca and Philo), not in Judaism.

Bauer's ideas were taken up in the Netherlands by the so-called Dutch radical school () and in Great Britain by authors such as Edwin Johnson, J.M. Robertson, and Thomas Whittaker.

An extravagant variant of the Jesus Myth Theory was developed in the 1970s by John Marco Allegro.

Contemporary proponents of the Jesus Myth Theory include Alvar Ellegård, George Albert Wells, Earl Doherty, and Robert M. Price.

External links

Pages in category "Jesus Myth Theory (subject)"

The following 50 pages are in this category, out of 50 total.

1

Media in category "Jesus Myth Theory (subject)"

The following 2 files are in this category, out of 2 total.