Daniel Boyarin (M / United States, 1946), scholar
File:Boyarin 1994.jpg
-- 1994 --
File:Boyarin 1999.jpg
-- 1999 --
File:Boyarin 2004.jpg
-- 2004 --
File:Boyarin 2012.jpg
-- 2012 --
Daniel Boyarin (b.1946) is a Jewish-American scholar, at the University of California (Berkeley, CA), USA. PhD (1975) at Jewish Theological Seminary. Taubman Professor of Talmudic Culture at the Dept. of Near Eastern Studies and Rhetoric, University of California at Berkeley.
-- 1990 --
Daniel Boyarin, A Radical Jew: Paul and the Politics of Identity (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1994)
- <Daniel Boyarin turns to the Epistles of Paul as the spiritual autobiography of a first-century Jewish cultural critic. What led Paul--in his dramatic conversion to Christianity--to such a radical critique of Jewish culture? Paul's famous formulation, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, no male and female in Christ," demonstrates the genius of Christianity: its concern for all people. The genius of Judaism is its validation of genealogy and cultural, ethnic difference. But the evils of these two thought systems are the obverse of their geniuses: Christianity has threatened to coerce universality, while ethnic difference is one of the most troubled issues in modern history. Boyarin posits a "diaspora identity" as a way to negotiate the pitfalls inherent in either position. Jewishness disrupts categories of identity because it is not national, genealogical, or even religious, but all of these, in dialectical tension with one another. It is analogous with gender: gender identity makes us different in some ways but not in others. An exploration of these tensions in the Pauline corpus, argues Boyarin, will lead us to a richer appreciation of our own cultural quandaries as male and female, gay and straight, Jew and Palestinian--and as human beings.>--Publisher description.
- <As a (post)modern confessing and professing Orthodox Jew, Boyarin seeks not only to recover the historical meaning of Paul's message, but also to appropriate the apostle's social and cultural critique of first-century Judaism in order to address contemporary cultural issues of Jewish (and non-Jewish) identity in Western society. Boyarin contends that Paul was extremely disturbed by the particularism and ethnocentricity which he saw in Judaism, and advocated for the oneness of humanity in which Jewish difference was overridden but unity and univocity among Jews and Gentiles could be appreciated. Paul, motivated by a Hellenistic desire of the One, produced through platonist allegorization an ideal of an universal human essence, one lying beyond difference and hierarchy. For Boyarin, the advantage of such a theology lies in its universality and call for parity among Jew and Gentile. The downside remains in its ultimate call for the eradication of any real, bodily, corporeal (and Jewish)difference, the elimination of the Other, a political discourse which has dominated European Christian history and often violently translated itself into policies which have sought to destroy dominated minorities (e.g., Jews, Africans, Native Americans, etc.). Rabbinic Judaism, for its part, resisted Paul's (and the subsequent Christian) call for univocity, positively affirming the bodily difference of the Jew, inscribed nowhere else than on the circumcised male penis, which Paul had tried to allegorize into an ideal undifferentiated phallus. The strength of the rabbinic anti-thesis to Paul lies in its ability to value cultural difference, but its particularistic proclivities can also lead the Jew to neglect the Other and generate into a form of racism, especially if the Jewish people finds itself in a position of power as in the case of the revival of modern Jewish state. In order to avoid this danger, Boyarin argues that the state of Israel must ultimately be structured on individual and cultural rights, no longer coded as a Jewish state but as a bi-national, secular, and multicultural one in which Judaism will continue to exist but no longer dominate nor oppress the Other.>--Isaac W. Oliver, University of Michigan.
- Contents : Introduction: Wrestling with Paul -- 1. Circumcision, Allegory, and Universal "Man" -- 2. What was Wrong with Judaism? The Cultural Politics of Pauline Scholarship -- 3. The Spirit and the Flesh: Paul's Political Anthropology -- 4. Moses; Veil; or, The Jewish Letter, the Christian Spirit -- 5. Circumcision and Revelation; or, The Politics of the Spirit -- 6. Was Paul an "Anti-Semite"? -- 7. Brides of Christ: Jewishness and the Pauline Origins of Christian Sexual Renunciation -- 8. "There Is No Male and Female": Galatians and Gender Trouble -- 9. Paul, the "Jewish Problem," and the "Woman Question" -- 10. Answering the Mail: Toward a Radical Jewishness.
- Reviews : Neil Elliott, Review of Biblical Literature (2000)
Daniel Boyarin, Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999)
- <Not long ago, everyone knew that Judaism came before Christianity. More recently, scholars have begun to recognize that the historical picture is quite a bit more complicated than that. In the Jewish world of the first century, many sects competed for the name of the true Israel and the true interpreter of the Torah?the Talmud itself speaks of seventy?and the form of Judaism that was to be the seedbed of what eventually became the Christian Church was but one of these many sects. Scholars have come to realize that we can and need to speak of a twin birth of Christianity and Judaism, not a genealogy in which one is parent to the other. In this book, the author develops a revised understanding of the interactions between nascent Christianity and nascent Judaism in late antiquity, interpreting the two ?new” religions as intensely and complexly intertwined throughout this period. Although the ?officials” of the eventual winners in both communities?the Rabbis in Judaism and the orthodox leaders in Christianity?sought to deny it, until the end of late antiquity many people remained both Christians and Jews. This resulted, among other things, in much shared religious innovation that affected the respective orthodoxies as well. Dying for God aims to establish this model as a realistic one through close and comparative readings of contemporary Christian texts and Talmudic narratives that thematize the connections and differences between Christians and Jews as these emerged around the issue of martyrdom. The author argues that, in the end, the developing discourse of martyrology involved the circulation and exchange of cultural and religious innovations between the two communities as they moved toward sharper self-definition.>--Publisher description.
- Contents : Introduction: When Christians were Jews: On Judeo-Christian Origins -- 1. The Close Call; or, Could a Pharisee be a Christian? -- 2. Quo Vadis?; or, The Acts of the Tricksters -- 3. Thinking with Virgins: Engendering Judeo-Christian Difference -- 4. Whose Martyrdom is this, Anyway? -- Appendix to Chapter 4: On the Methodology and Theology of W.H.C. Friend's Martyrdom and Persecution in the Early church.
- Italian ed. : Morire per Dio: il martirio e la formazione di cristianesimo e giudaismo (2008 Boyarin / Ursino), book (Italian ed.)
-- 2000 --
Daniel Boyarin, Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004).
- <The historical separation between Judaism and Christianity is often figured as a clearly defined break of a single entity into two separate religions. Following this model, there would have been one religion known as Judaism before the birth of Christ, which then took on a hybrid identity. Even before its subsequent division, certain beliefs and practices of this composite would have been identifiable as Christian or Jewish.In Border Lines, however, Daniel Boyarin makes a striking case for a very different way of thinking about the historical development that is the partition of Judaeo-Christianity. There were no characteristics or features that could be described as uniquely Jewish or Christian in late antiquity, Boyarin argues. Rather, Jesus-following Jews and Jews who did not follow Jesus lived on a cultural map in which beliefs, such as that in a second divine being, and practices, such as keeping kosher or maintaining the Sabbath, were widely and variably distributed. The ultimate distinctions between Judaism and Christianity were imposed from above by "border-makers," heresiologists anxious to construct a discrete identity for Christianity. By defining some beliefs and practices as Christian and others as Jewish or heretical, they moved ideas, behaviors, and people to one side or another of an artificial border--and, Boyarin significantly contends, invented the very notion of religion.>--Publisher description.
- Contents : Preface: Interrogate, My Love -- 1. Introduction -- Part I: Making a Difference: The Heresiological Beginnings of Christianity and Judaism -- 2. Justin's Dialogue with the Jews: The Beginnings of Orthodoxy -- 3. Naturalizing the Border: Apostolic Succession in the Mishnah -- Part II: The Crucifixion of the Logos: How Logos Theology Became Christian -- 4. The Intertextual Birth of the Logos: The Prologue to John as a Jewish Midrash -- 5. The Jewish Life of the Logos: Logos Theology in Pre- and Pararabbinic Judaism -- 6. The Crucifixion of the Memra: How the Logos Became Christian -- Part III: Sparks of the Logos: Historicizing Rabbinic Religion -- 7. The Yavneh Legend of the Stammaim: On the Invention of the Rabbis in the Sixth Century -- 8. "When the Kingdom Turned to Minut ": The Christian Empire and the Rabbinic Refusal of Religion -- Concluding Political Postscript: A Fragment
- Reviews : Jed Wyrick, RBL
- Translations : Ortodoxos, híbridos y heterodoxos: La formación del judaísmo y del cristianismo en la Antigüedad tardía (2012 Boyarin / Segovia), book (Spanish ed.) -- Translated into German in Berlin: Institut Kirche und Judentum, 2009.