Difference between revisions of "Enoch restitutus (1836 Murray), book"
(Created page with ''''Enoch restitutus; or, An Attempt to Separate from the books of Enoch, the Book quoted by St. Jude. Also a Comparison of the Chronology of Enoch with the Hebrew Computation, an…') |
|||
| (22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
==Editions | In this work the Anglican clergyman Edward Murray suggested that the now published book of Henoch should be seen only as a corrupted version of the “original” mentioned by the Letter of Jude and other ancient authors. It was the final and failed attempt to harmonize the Hermetic tradition of the antiquity of Henoch-Hermes and his writings with the new discoveries. Murray’s book was poorly received; a tradition that for centuries had been at the center of scholarly debate suddenly appeared a worthless, fanciful theory with no legitimacy in Enochic scholarship. | ||
==Editions == | |||
Published in London [England]: Rivington, 1836. | Published in London [England]: Rivington, 1836. | ||
== | ==Contents== | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=eXUtWpsIu5MC&dq=Enoch+restitutus+Murray&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=rd3os4OKtt&sig=lXHJRD2pSbG16rFDMKhvbV3BVtg&hl=en&ei=vu7VSrWNH42QMfD_qJQD&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false Googl Books (full view)] | *[http://books.google.com/books?id=eXUtWpsIu5MC&dq=Enoch+restitutus+Murray&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=rd3os4OKtt&sig=lXHJRD2pSbG16rFDMKhvbV3BVtg&hl=en&ei=vu7VSrWNH42QMfD_qJQD&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false Googl Books (full view)] | ||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:1836| Murray]] | ||
[[Category:English | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:English language--1800s|1836 Murray]] | ||
[[Category:Enoch (subject)]] | |||
[[Category:OT Pseudepigrapha Studies--1800s|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:OT Pseudepigrapha Studies--English|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:Apocalyptic Studies--1800s|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:Apocalyptic Studies--English|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:Enochic Studies--1800s|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:Enochic Studies--English|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:1 Enoch (text)|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:1 Enoch--Translations (text)|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:1 Enoch--English tr. (text)|1836 Murray]] | |||
[[Category:Enoch in Hermeticism (subject)|1836 Murray]] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:56, 6 May 2016
Enoch restitutus; or, An Attempt to Separate from the books of Enoch, the Book quoted by St. Jude. Also a Comparison of the Chronology of Enoch with the Hebrew Computation, and with the Periods Mentioned in the Book of Daniel and in the Apocalypse (1836) is a book by Edward Murray.
Abstract
In this work the Anglican clergyman Edward Murray suggested that the now published book of Henoch should be seen only as a corrupted version of the “original” mentioned by the Letter of Jude and other ancient authors. It was the final and failed attempt to harmonize the Hermetic tradition of the antiquity of Henoch-Hermes and his writings with the new discoveries. Murray’s book was poorly received; a tradition that for centuries had been at the center of scholarly debate suddenly appeared a worthless, fanciful theory with no legitimacy in Enochic scholarship.
Editions
Published in London [England]: Rivington, 1836.