Difference between revisions of "Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees (2009 Boccaccini, Ibba), edited volume"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:


==Editions and translations==
==Editions and translations==
Published in the United States (Grand Rapids, MI: [[Eerdmans]], 2009).
Published in the United States (Grand Rapids, MI: [[Eerdmans]], 2009). Online preview, at [http://books.google.com/books?id=aG0dJ-dvJ80C&dq=Essays+on+the+Book+of+Enoch+%282009+Knibb%29&client=firefox-a&hl=it&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google Books].


==Abstract==
==Abstract==

Revision as of 08:46, 30 August 2009

Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees is a volume edited by Gabriele Boccaccini and Giovanni Ibba.

Editions and translations

Published in the United States (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009). Online preview, at Google Books.

Abstract

Proceedings of the Fourth Enoch Seminar (Camaldoli 2007).

"The early Enoch literature does not refer to the Mosaic Torah or emphasize the distinctively Mosaic laws designed for Israel. But the book of Jubilees gives room to both Mosaic and Enochic traditions within the Sinaitic revelatory framework. What, then, should we make of such differences? / This question and related speculations were on the minds of scholars gathered from around the world at the fourth Enoch Seminar at Camaldoli, Italy, in July 2007. Four tendencies emerged from the discussion at the seminar. Some scholars claimed that Jubilees was a direct product of Enochic Judaism with subordinated Mosaic features. Some suggested that Jubilees was a conscious synthesis of Enochic and Mosaic tradition, yet remaining autonomous from both. Some asserted that Jubilees was essentially a Mosaic text with some Enochic influence. And others questioned the very existence of a gulf between Enochic and Mosaic traditions as competing forms of Judaism at the time of Jubilees. / Gabriele Boccaccini and Giovanni Ibba have carefully collected the countervailing views into this volume. What readers will find here is a lively debate among the most distinguished international specialists, together striving for a better understanding of a puzzling ancient document." (Synopsis provided by the Publisher)

Table of Contents