Category:Historical Jesus Studies--Italy

• BACK to the HISTORICAL JESUS STUDIES--INDEX
• BACK to the ITALIAN SCHOLARSHIP--INDEX
• BACK to the ITALY--INDEX

Historical Jesus Studies in Italy / Italian Scholarship on Jesus

• See Historical Jesus Scholars in Italy

The category includes:

• (a) Works by Italian Scholars; see Historical Jesus Studies--Italian Scholarship
• (b) Translations of Scholarly Works into Italian; see Translated into Italian
• (c) Non-Fictional Works by Italian Authors, including Translations of Non-Fictional Works into Italian; see Historical Jesus Studies--Italian Non-Fiction
• (d) Fictional Works by Italian Works, including Translations of Fictional Works into Italian; see Historical Jesus Studies--Italian Fiction

See also Historical Jesus Studies--Italian language, for a complete list of works available in Italian language.

Overview

No Italian scholars contributed to the international rise of modern critical research on the Historical Jesus, which was prompted by the publication in 1774-78 of the work of Hermann Samuel Reimarus. The only conspicuous exception is given by historian Aurelio Bianchi-Giovini, who in 1853, challenging censorship and risking jail, made available to Italian readers the most advanced results of international research. Bianchi-Giovani remained a brilliant, yet isolated figure of precursor in the field of Second Temple Judaism and Christian Origins.

A more solid beginning was provided by the translation of the works of David Friedrich Strauss and Ernest Renan in 1863, which was made possible by the new climate of religious freedom following the establishment of the new Italian State. In a field monopolized by Catholic theologians and priests, the publication of such works was in itself a great accomplishment, being preceded and followed by a flow of scandalized judgments and apologetic responses. The most popular "Lives of Jesus" of nineteenth century Italy were literary works of spiritual edification, composed of Catholic prelates of great erudition, such as Antonio Cesari, Giuseppe Lorini and Cardinal Alfonso Capecelatro. Their scope did not go beyond the objective of providing a harmonization of the gospels in an elegant and consistent historical-biographical narrative. Only in the work of

Only at the turn of the century, after the consolidation of the Italian State, we have the first scholarly contributions by University professors Alessandro Chiappelli and Baldassare Labanca, both in line with the approach of the European Liberal School. At the beginning of the twentieth century the development of the international “Modernist” movement in Roman Catholicism prompted the rise also of an Italian school promoting a rationalistic approach to Scriptures across established religious boundaries (University professors Adolfo Omodeo, Ernesto Buonaiuti, Luigi Salvatorelli, and Pietro Martinetti, as well as Jewish scholars Felice Momigliano and Israele Zolli, Protestant scholars Piero Chiminelli e Giovanni Luzzi, and Catholic scholars Leone Tondelli and Giuseppe Ricciotti). The condemnation of Modernism by Pope Pius X in 1907, the rise of Fascism in the ‘20s and especially, the Concordat of 1929 between Fascist Italy and the Vatican, and the anti-Jewish racial law in 1938, caused a progressive yet dramatic decline in the freedom of research and the end of this creative experience. The generation of Modernism would have no heirs.

It would take 40 years to see a new beginning and blossoming of an Italian school in the 1980s and 1990s, after the Second Vatican Council laid the foundations for a renewed interest in historical research and fostered a new climate of freedom and ecumenical dialogue. The seminal work of Carlo Maria Martini, rector of the Pontifical Biblical institute in the 1970s, prepares the path for the emergence of a new generation of Italian scholars: University professors Giorgio Jossa, Mauro Pesce, and Paolo Sacchi, as well as Theological Seminary professors Giuseppe Barbaglio, Rinaldo Fabris, Bruno Maggioni, and Giuseppe Segalla. The future of Italian scholarly research on Jesus today appears brighter as more Italian scholars in the field are engaged in international ventures (Mauro Pesce, Paolo Sacchi, Giorgio Jossa, Marcello Del Verme) or teach abroad (Enrico Norelli, Gabriele Boccaccini, Pierluigi Piovanelli, Edmondo Lupieri). Yet there are three major obstacles: the precarious situation of studies in religion in Italian Universities and Seminaries; the lasting influence of religious conservatism against the historical method; and the difficulty for young researchers and scholars to find academic positions. What will follow the generation of the Second Vatican Council is yet to be seen.