Difference between revisions of "The Son of Man Debate (1999 Burkett), book"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Saul Hankin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Table of contents== | ==Table of contents== | ||
*Introduction | |||
*1. Genealogical Interpretations | |||
*2. The human Son of Man | |||
*3. The apocalyptic/messianic Son of Man | |||
*4. The question of reference | |||
*5. The question of authenticity | |||
*6. Miscellaneous sons of men | |||
*7. Exit the apocalyptic Son of Man? | |||
*8. The idiomatic/nontitular son of man | |||
*9. Son of Man in apocalyptic and rabbinic texts | |||
*10. Conclusions | |||
*Appendix: Surveys of research of "the Son of Man" | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 7 April 2010
The Son of Man Debate: A History and Evaluation (1999) is a book by Delbert Burkett.
Abstract
Editions and translations
Published in Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Table of contents
- Introduction
- 1. Genealogical Interpretations
- 2. The human Son of Man
- 3. The apocalyptic/messianic Son of Man
- 4. The question of reference
- 5. The question of authenticity
- 6. Miscellaneous sons of men
- 7. Exit the apocalyptic Son of Man?
- 8. The idiomatic/nontitular son of man
- 9. Son of Man in apocalyptic and rabbinic texts
- 10. Conclusions
- Appendix: Surveys of research of "the Son of Man"