Difference between revisions of "United Monarchy"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A '''Unified Monarchy''' existed in the land of Israel, according to Jewish tradition, from around BCE to 930 BCE, following the period of the Judges, before the division...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Unified Monarchy''' existed in the land of Israel, according to Jewish tradition, from around BCE to 930 BCE, following the period of the [[Judges]], before the division of the [[Kingdoms of Judah and Israel]].  
A '''Unified Monarchy''' existed in the land of Israel, according to Jewish tradition, following the period of the [[Judges]], from the establishment of the Kingdom of [[Saul]] (traditionally dated around 1037 BCE) to around BCE to 930 BCE, before the division of the [[Kingdoms of Judah and Israel]].  


== Overview ==
== Overview ==


In contemporary scholarship, the united monarchy is debated, due to a lack of archaeological evidence for it. It is generally accepted that a "[[House of David]]" existed, but David could have only been the king or chieftain of Judah, which was likely small. The northern kingdom was a separate development.
In contemporary scholarship, the very existence of a Unified Monarchy is debated, due to a lack of archaeological evidence for it. It is generally accepted that a "[[House of David]]" existed, but David could have only been the king or chieftain of Judah, which was likely small. The northern kingdom was a separate development.

Revision as of 18:02, 10 October 2020

A Unified Monarchy existed in the land of Israel, according to Jewish tradition, following the period of the Judges, from the establishment of the Kingdom of Saul (traditionally dated around 1037 BCE) to around BCE to 930 BCE, before the division of the Kingdoms of Judah and Israel.

Overview

In contemporary scholarship, the very existence of a Unified Monarchy is debated, due to a lack of archaeological evidence for it. It is generally accepted that a "House of David" existed, but David could have only been the king or chieftain of Judah, which was likely small. The northern kingdom was a separate development.