Difference between revisions of "United Monarchy"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
According to Jewish tradition, a '''United Monarchy''' existed in the land of Israel, following the period of the [[Judges]], from the establishment of the Kingdom of [[Saul]] (traditionally dated around 1037 BCE) to around 930 BCE, with the division of the [[Kingdoms of Judah and Israel]].  
According to Jewish tradition, a '''United Monarchy''' existed in the land of Israel, following the period of the [[Judges]], from the establishment of the Kingdom of [[Saul]] (traditionally dated around 1047 BCE) to around 930 BCE, with the division of the [[Kingdoms of Judah and Israel]].  


== Overview ==
== Overview ==


In contemporary scholarship, the very existence of a Unified Monarchy is debated, due to a lack of archaeological evidence for it. It is generally accepted that a "[[House of David]]" existed, but David could have only been the king or chieftain of Judah, which was likely small. The northern kingdom was a separate development.
In contemporary scholarship the [[United Monarchy ]]is generally held to be a literary construction and not a historical reality, pointing to the lack of archaeological evidence. It is generally accepted that a "[[House of David]]" existed, but David could have only been the king or chieftain of Judah, which was likely small. The northern kingdom was a separate development.

Revision as of 18:34, 10 October 2020

According to Jewish tradition, a United Monarchy existed in the land of Israel, following the period of the Judges, from the establishment of the Kingdom of Saul (traditionally dated around 1047 BCE) to around 930 BCE, with the division of the Kingdoms of Judah and Israel.

Overview

In contemporary scholarship the United Monarchy is generally held to be a literary construction and not a historical reality, pointing to the lack of archaeological evidence. It is generally accepted that a "House of David" existed, but David could have only been the king or chieftain of Judah, which was likely small. The northern kingdom was a separate development.