Difference between revisions of "File:1743 Annet.jpg"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Gabriele Boccaccini uploaded File:1743 Annet.jpg)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''' The Resurrection of Jesus, considered in answer to The tryal of the witnesses''' (1743) is a book by [[Peter Annet]].  
{en} [[Peter Annet]]. ''''' The Resurrection of Jesus, considered in answer to The tryal of the witnesses'''''. [[London, England]]: printed for the Author, 1743.  


==Abstract==
==Abstract==
Published anonymously ("by a moral philosopher") in answer to [[The Tryal to the Witnesses of the Resurrection (1729 Sherlock), drama?]]. By highlighting all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the gospel narratives, Annet dismissed the historicity of the resurrection, as an event that Jesus did not foretold and never happened. Annet was the first to suggest that it could have been a case of apparent death; see [[Jesus Survival Theory]]
Published anonymously ("by a moral philosopher") in answer to [[The Tryal to the Witnesses of the Resurrection (1729 Sherlock), drama?]]. By highlighting all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the gospel narratives, Annet dismissed the historicity of the resurrection, as an event that Jesus did not foretold and never happened. Annet was the first to suggest that it could have been a case of apparent death; see [[Jesus Survival Theory]]


==Editions==
==Contents==
Published in [[London, England]]: printed for the Author, 1743.
 
==Table of contents==


==External links==
==External links==

Latest revision as of 07:14, 30 August 2022

{en} Peter Annet. The Resurrection of Jesus, considered in answer to The tryal of the witnesses. London, England: printed for the Author, 1743.

Abstract

Published anonymously ("by a moral philosopher") in answer to The Tryal to the Witnesses of the Resurrection (1729 Sherlock), drama?. By highlighting all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the gospel narratives, Annet dismissed the historicity of the resurrection, as an event that Jesus did not foretold and never happened. Annet was the first to suggest that it could have been a case of apparent death; see Jesus Survival Theory

Contents

External links

  • [ Google Books]

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current05:59, 30 August 2022Thumbnail for version as of 05:59, 30 August 2022384 × 499 (31 KB)Gabriele Boccaccini (talk | contribs)

There are no pages that use this file.