Difference between revisions of "File:1743 Annet.jpg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "''' The Resurrection of Jesus, considered in answer to The tryal of the witnesses''' (1743) is a book by Peter Annet. ==Abstract== Published anonymously ("by a moral phi...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' The Resurrection of Jesus, considered in answer to The tryal of the witnesses''' | {en} [[Peter Annet]]. ''''' The Resurrection of Jesus, considered in answer to The tryal of the witnesses'''''. [[London, England]]: printed for the Author, 1743. | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Published anonymously ("by a moral philosopher") in answer to [[The Tryal to the Witnesses of the Resurrection (1729 Sherlock), drama?]]. By highlighting all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the gospel narratives, Annet dismissed the historicity of the resurrection, as an event that Jesus did not foretold and never happened. Annet was the first to suggest that it could have been a case of apparent death; see [[Jesus Survival Theory]] | Published anonymously ("by a moral philosopher") in answer to [[The Tryal to the Witnesses of the Resurrection (1729 Sherlock), drama?]]. By highlighting all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the gospel narratives, Annet dismissed the historicity of the resurrection, as an event that Jesus did not foretold and never happened. Annet was the first to suggest that it could have been a case of apparent death; see [[Jesus Survival Theory]] | ||
== | ==Contents== | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Latest revision as of 07:14, 30 August 2022
{en} Peter Annet. The Resurrection of Jesus, considered in answer to The tryal of the witnesses. London, England: printed for the Author, 1743.
Abstract
Published anonymously ("by a moral philosopher") in answer to The Tryal to the Witnesses of the Resurrection (1729 Sherlock), drama?. By highlighting all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the gospel narratives, Annet dismissed the historicity of the resurrection, as an event that Jesus did not foretold and never happened. Annet was the first to suggest that it could have been a case of apparent death; see Jesus Survival Theory
Contents
External links
- [ Google Books]
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 05:59, 30 August 2022 |  | 384 × 499 (31 KB) | Gabriele Boccaccini (talk | contribs) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.
