Difference between revisions of "Category:Arch-fi"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Unsubstantiated claims of ''lost'' historical documents or overt forgery have affected the field of Biblical Studies since its inception | Unsubstantiated claims of ''lost'' historical documents or overt forgery have affected the field of Biblical Studies since its inception. These ''Modern Apocrypha'' offered alternative views and new meanings to familiar events and familiar characters, while claiming for scholarly attention. | ||
A new phenomenon occurred at the end of the 19th century, when some ancient and new legends exited the real of fiction and began to be developed in ''scholarly'' form. In 1894 Notovitich claimed to have found evidence that [[:Category:Jesus in India (subject)|Jesus lived in India]]. Such a belief developed in more and more elaborated theories based on the assumption that [[:Category:Jesus Survival (subject)|Jesus survived the crucifixion]] and/or [[:Category:Married Jesus (subject)|had a wife]] or [[:Category:Jesus Bloodline (subject)|fathered a child]]. | |||
What all these theories have in common is a total disregard for, if not an overt opposition against, the rules of the historical method. Instead of testing the evidence to see what hypotheses it fits, Arch-fi frames the archaeological data to fit the "desired conclusion." | What all these theories have in common is a total disregard for, if not an overt opposition against, the rules of the historical method. Instead of testing the evidence to see what hypotheses it fits, Arch-fi frames the archaeological data to fit the "desired conclusion." | ||
Revision as of 20:12, 25 February 2012
<<WORK IN PROGRESS>>
Arch-fi (or Fantastic Archaeology) refers to a series of theories developed outside (or against) the canons of critical archaeology.
Overview
Unsubstantiated claims of lost historical documents or overt forgery have affected the field of Biblical Studies since its inception. These Modern Apocrypha offered alternative views and new meanings to familiar events and familiar characters, while claiming for scholarly attention.
A new phenomenon occurred at the end of the 19th century, when some ancient and new legends exited the real of fiction and began to be developed in scholarly form. In 1894 Notovitich claimed to have found evidence that Jesus lived in India. Such a belief developed in more and more elaborated theories based on the assumption that Jesus survived the crucifixion and/or had a wife or fathered a child.
What all these theories have in common is a total disregard for, if not an overt opposition against, the rules of the historical method. Instead of testing the evidence to see what hypotheses it fits, Arch-fi frames the archaeological data to fit the "desired conclusion."
Pages in category "Arch-fi"
The following 18 pages are in this category, out of 18 total.