Difference between revisions of "Category:Ananus ben Ananus (subject)"
(Replaced content with '*DICTIONARY: see Ananus ben Ananus *ANCIENT SOURCES: see Ananus ben Ananus (sources) '''List of scholarly and fictional works on Ananus ben Ananus (in chronolog…') |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* | *[[:Category:People|BACK TO THE PEOPLE--INDEX]] | ||
''' | '''Ananus ben Ananus''' was the Jewish High Priest in 63 CE, and the leader of the anti-Zealot faction in Jerusalem during the Jewish revolt in 66-68 CE. | ||
[[Category: | ==Overview== | ||
Ananus was the son of [[:Category:Annas (subject)|Annas (Ananus ben Seth)]], therefore a member of the powerful family who controlled the High Priesthood in the first century. He was the only High Priest of whom it is explicitly said (by [[Josephus]]) that he was not simply associated with the [[Sadducees]] but actually a member of that party. In spite of his strong connections, Ananus remained in power only three months, as he took advantage of the interregnum between [[:Category:Festus (subject)|Festus]] and [[:Category:Albinus (subject)|Albinus]] to execute [[:Category:James (subject)|James]], the brother of [[:Category:Jesus of Nazareth (subject)|Jesus of Nazareth]], and others, as "breakers of the Law." Ananus's action seems to confirm a consistent pattern of opposition by members of the House of [[Annas]] towards the Jesus movement. Ananus however was denounced by "the most equitable of the citizens" and accused by [[:Category:Albinus (subject)|Albinus]] of abuse of power for "assembling a sanhedrim without his consent." As a result Ananus was deposed by [[:Category:Herod Agrippa II (subject)|Herod Agrippa II]] and replaced by [[:Category:Joshua ben Damnaeus (subject)|Joshua ben Damnaeus]]. | |||
According to Josephus, the former high priest played a major role at Jerusalem during the [[Jewish revolt]], where he led the moderate and anti-Zealot faction of the rebellion, until his assassination. After the defeat of Cestius in 66 CE, members of the Jewish aristocracy "partly by force, partly by persuasion" joined the rebellion. Ananus was appointed with [[Joseph ben Gorion]] "to the supreme control of the city (of Jerusalem) with a special charge to raise the height of the walls"(Bel II 562-63). Teaming with other former High Priest [[Joshua ben Gamaliel]], Ananus tried hard to fight against the rising power of the [[Zealots]] but they were both ultimately defeated and murdered. Josephus praised Ananus as a brave leader who was "unique in his love of liberty and an enthusiast for democracy," and whose "supreme object was to maintain peace." In his opinion, "the capture of the city began with the death of Ananaus," as the leadership of the rebellion fell into the hands of the most radical elements and the moderate leaders (among whom Josephus reckoned himself) were marginalized. | |||
==In Depth== | |||
* [[Ananus ben Ananus (sources)]] -- survey of ancient sources | |||
* [[Ananus ben Ananus (arts)]] -- survey of fictional works | |||
* [[Ananus ben Ananus (research)]] -- survey of scholarly works | |||
==Ananus in Scholarship== | |||
Scholarly debate has focused on three major issues: (a) the relationship between the Sadducees and Ananus (and the House of [[Annas]] in general); (b) the episode of the killing of James; and (c) the pro-Roman or anti-Roman attitude of Ananus during the [[Jewish War]]. | |||
Some scholars take the reference to Ananus the Sadducee as evidence of the Sadducean membership of the entire House of Annas; some caution that "we have no evidence for such a conclusion" (VanderKam). | |||
Tessa Rajak maintains that the reference to James is a Christian interpolation, with no historical value; others (Poehlmann, VanderKam) give credibility to the episode. | |||
According to Smallwood, Ananus was consistently anti-Roman since his act of defiance in executing James, and urged moderation only when he finally realized the futility of the resistance. Horsley instead suggests that Ananus joined the revolt only reluctantly and remained always pro-Roman. Others point out at the difficulty to provide any historical reconstruction as Josephus' account is too much influenced by his own apologetic concerns. | |||
====References==== | |||
*High Priests and Politics in Roman Palestine / [[E. Mary Smallwood]] / JTS 13 (1962) / pp.14-34 | |||
*High Priests and the Politics of Roman Palestine / [[Richard A. Horsley]] / JSJ 17 (1986) / pp.23-55 | |||
*The Sadducees as Josephus Presents Them; or, The Curious Case of Ananus / [[W. Poehlmann]] / [[All Things New (1992 Hulltgren, et al.), edited volume]] / pp.87-100 | |||
*The Jewish Leadership in Jerusalem in the First Part of the Great Revolt (66-68 BE) / [[Uriel Rappaport]] / [[The Congregation of Israel (2001 Gafni), edited volume]] / pp.75-83 <Hebrew> | |||
*[[From Joshua to Caiaphas (2004 VanderKam), book]] / pp.476-482 | |||
==Related categories== | |||
*[[High Priests]] / [[:Category:Annas (subject)|Annas (subject)]] / [[Joshua ben Gamaliel]] | |||
*[[:Category:James (subject)|James (subject)]] | |||
*[[:Category:Herod Agrippa II (subject)|Herod Agrippa II (subject)]] / [[:Category:Albinus (subject)|Albinus (subject)]] | |||
==External links== | |||
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ananus_ben_Ananus Wikipedia] | |||
[[Category:Index (database)]] | |||
[[Category:People (database)]] |
Revision as of 09:02, 20 February 2012
Ananus ben Ananus was the Jewish High Priest in 63 CE, and the leader of the anti-Zealot faction in Jerusalem during the Jewish revolt in 66-68 CE.
Overview
Ananus was the son of Annas (Ananus ben Seth), therefore a member of the powerful family who controlled the High Priesthood in the first century. He was the only High Priest of whom it is explicitly said (by Josephus) that he was not simply associated with the Sadducees but actually a member of that party. In spite of his strong connections, Ananus remained in power only three months, as he took advantage of the interregnum between Festus and Albinus to execute James, the brother of Jesus of Nazareth, and others, as "breakers of the Law." Ananus's action seems to confirm a consistent pattern of opposition by members of the House of Annas towards the Jesus movement. Ananus however was denounced by "the most equitable of the citizens" and accused by Albinus of abuse of power for "assembling a sanhedrim without his consent." As a result Ananus was deposed by Herod Agrippa II and replaced by Joshua ben Damnaeus.
According to Josephus, the former high priest played a major role at Jerusalem during the Jewish revolt, where he led the moderate and anti-Zealot faction of the rebellion, until his assassination. After the defeat of Cestius in 66 CE, members of the Jewish aristocracy "partly by force, partly by persuasion" joined the rebellion. Ananus was appointed with Joseph ben Gorion "to the supreme control of the city (of Jerusalem) with a special charge to raise the height of the walls"(Bel II 562-63). Teaming with other former High Priest Joshua ben Gamaliel, Ananus tried hard to fight against the rising power of the Zealots but they were both ultimately defeated and murdered. Josephus praised Ananus as a brave leader who was "unique in his love of liberty and an enthusiast for democracy," and whose "supreme object was to maintain peace." In his opinion, "the capture of the city began with the death of Ananaus," as the leadership of the rebellion fell into the hands of the most radical elements and the moderate leaders (among whom Josephus reckoned himself) were marginalized.
In Depth
- Ananus ben Ananus (sources) -- survey of ancient sources
- Ananus ben Ananus (arts) -- survey of fictional works
- Ananus ben Ananus (research) -- survey of scholarly works
Ananus in Scholarship
Scholarly debate has focused on three major issues: (a) the relationship between the Sadducees and Ananus (and the House of Annas in general); (b) the episode of the killing of James; and (c) the pro-Roman or anti-Roman attitude of Ananus during the Jewish War.
Some scholars take the reference to Ananus the Sadducee as evidence of the Sadducean membership of the entire House of Annas; some caution that "we have no evidence for such a conclusion" (VanderKam).
Tessa Rajak maintains that the reference to James is a Christian interpolation, with no historical value; others (Poehlmann, VanderKam) give credibility to the episode.
According to Smallwood, Ananus was consistently anti-Roman since his act of defiance in executing James, and urged moderation only when he finally realized the futility of the resistance. Horsley instead suggests that Ananus joined the revolt only reluctantly and remained always pro-Roman. Others point out at the difficulty to provide any historical reconstruction as Josephus' account is too much influenced by his own apologetic concerns.
References
- High Priests and Politics in Roman Palestine / E. Mary Smallwood / JTS 13 (1962) / pp.14-34
- High Priests and the Politics of Roman Palestine / Richard A. Horsley / JSJ 17 (1986) / pp.23-55
- The Sadducees as Josephus Presents Them; or, The Curious Case of Ananus / W. Poehlmann / All Things New (1992 Hulltgren, et al.), edited volume / pp.87-100
- The Jewish Leadership in Jerusalem in the First Part of the Great Revolt (66-68 BE) / Uriel Rappaport / The Congregation of Israel (2001 Gafni), edited volume / pp.75-83 <Hebrew>
- From Joshua to Caiaphas (2004 VanderKam), book / pp.476-482
Related categories
- High Priests / Annas (subject) / Joshua ben Gamaliel
- James (subject)
- Herod Agrippa II (subject) / Albinus (subject)
External links
This category currently contains no pages or media.