Difference between revisions of "Fourth Ezra ~ Hermeneia (1990 Stone), book"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Stone rejected the documentary hypothesis in the composition of 4 Ezra and strongly advocated the unity of the text. | |||
4 Ezra is not a literary representation of a theological debate external to the author; it is rather a reflection of his own divided mind, of his own internal struggle. "The religious experiences described in 4 Ezra... were the actual experiences of the author" (p.33). | |||
==Editions and translations== | ==Editions and translations== | ||
Published in Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1990 ([[Hermeneia]]); edited by [[Frank M. Cross]]. | Published in Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1990 ([[Hermeneia]]); edited by [[Frank M. Cross]]. | ||
Revision as of 11:55, 12 March 2011
Fourth Ezra: A Commentary (1990) is a book by Michael E. Stone.
Abstract
Stone rejected the documentary hypothesis in the composition of 4 Ezra and strongly advocated the unity of the text.
4 Ezra is not a literary representation of a theological debate external to the author; it is rather a reflection of his own divided mind, of his own internal struggle. "The religious experiences described in 4 Ezra... were the actual experiences of the author" (p.33).
Editions and translations
Published in Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1990 (Hermeneia); edited by Frank M. Cross.