Difference between revisions of "Paganisme des Hébreux: jusqu'à la captivité de Babylone (1884 Ferrière), book"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
==Abstract ==
==Abstract ==


Swept up in the fervor of Darwinian evolutionary models and the inherent positivism of his day, Ferrière suggests that monotheism did not arise among the Israelite people until the time of the Babylonian exile.  As he himself puts it, the goal of his book is to:  "Prouver par des faits, conformément à la méthode expérimentale, que le monothéisme primordial des Hébreux est une fiction; que le peuple d Israël a été païen et a partagé toutes les pratiques du paganisme cananéen jusqu à la captivité de Babylone, tel est le but de ce livre (3)."  Accordingly, for Ferrière the ancient Israelites were just as polytheistic as their so-called pagan, Ancient Near Eastern neighbors.  His thesis is largely dependent upon the work of his near contemporary, Julius Wellhausen, who stirred a controversy in ecclesiastical and scholarly circles by suggesting that Moses himself did not write the Torah.  Instead, Wellhausen demonstrated that four principle sources (later developed into J, E, P, D) were combined by priestly, exilic writers to compose the Pentateuch nine to eleven centuries after Moses.  ~Deborah Forger
Swept up in the fervor of Darwinian evolutionary models and the inherent positivism of his day, Ferrière suggests that monotheism did not arise among the Israelite people until the time of the Babylonian exile.  As he himself puts it, the goal of his book is to:  "Prouver par des faits, conformément à la méthode expérimentale, que le monothéisme primordial des Hébreux est une fiction; que le peuple d Israël a été païen et a partagé toutes les pratiques du paganisme cananéen jusqu à la captivité de Babylone, tel est le but de ce livre (3)."  Accordingly, for Ferrière the ancient Israelites were just as polytheistic as their so-called pagan, Ancient Near Eastern neighbors.  In order to demonstrate this thesis, Ferrière structures his work into four primary parts.  In part one, he establishes a timeline for the books of the Old Testament, with a particular focus on the Pentateuch.  In part two, he explores the general religious practices of persons from the Ancient Near East.  In part three, he investigates the tetragrammaton and general beliefs among the Israelites about God prior to the exile.  In part four, he concludes that the ancient Hebrew people, without exception, embodied and practiced their religious in a similar fashion to all their Semitic neighbors.  In other words, the Israelites where in all ways polytheistic.  Though not explicitly stated, the underpinnings of Ferrière's thesis are largely dependent upon the work of his near contemporary, Julius Wellhausen, who stirred a controversy in ecclesiastical and scholarly circles by suggesting that Moses himself did not write the Torah.  Instead, Wellhausen demonstrated that four principle sources (later developed into J, E, P, D) were combined by priestly, exilic writers to compose the Pentateuch nine to eleven centuries after Moses.  ~Deborah Forger


==Editions and translations==
==Editions and translations==

Revision as of 10:02, 15 August 2012

Paganisme des Hébreux: jusqu'à la captivité de Babylone (1884) is a book by Émile Ferrière.

Abstract

Swept up in the fervor of Darwinian evolutionary models and the inherent positivism of his day, Ferrière suggests that monotheism did not arise among the Israelite people until the time of the Babylonian exile. As he himself puts it, the goal of his book is to: "Prouver par des faits, conformément à la méthode expérimentale, que le monothéisme primordial des Hébreux est une fiction; que le peuple d Israël a été païen et a partagé toutes les pratiques du paganisme cananéen jusqu à la captivité de Babylone, tel est le but de ce livre (3)." Accordingly, for Ferrière the ancient Israelites were just as polytheistic as their so-called pagan, Ancient Near Eastern neighbors. In order to demonstrate this thesis, Ferrière structures his work into four primary parts. In part one, he establishes a timeline for the books of the Old Testament, with a particular focus on the Pentateuch. In part two, he explores the general religious practices of persons from the Ancient Near East. In part three, he investigates the tetragrammaton and general beliefs among the Israelites about God prior to the exile. In part four, he concludes that the ancient Hebrew people, without exception, embodied and practiced their religious in a similar fashion to all their Semitic neighbors. In other words, the Israelites where in all ways polytheistic. Though not explicitly stated, the underpinnings of Ferrière's thesis are largely dependent upon the work of his near contemporary, Julius Wellhausen, who stirred a controversy in ecclesiastical and scholarly circles by suggesting that Moses himself did not write the Torah. Instead, Wellhausen demonstrated that four principle sources (later developed into J, E, P, D) were combined by priestly, exilic writers to compose the Pentateuch nine to eleven centuries after Moses. ~Deborah Forger

Editions and translations

Published in Paris [France]: F. Alcan, 1884.

Contents

  • Preface

External links