Difference between revisions of "Category:Enochic Studies--1970s"

Michael A. Knibb

David Suter

• BACK to the ENOCHIC STUDIES--INDEX
• BACK to the MADE IN THE 1970s--INDEX

Enochic Studies in the 1970s--Works and Authors

< Pre-Modern (Top) -- 1400s (Top) -- 1500s (Top) -- 1600s (Top) -- 1700s (Top) -- 1800s (Top) -- 1850s (Top) -- 1900s (Top) -- 1910s (Top) -- 1920s (Top) -- 1930s (Top) -- 1940s (Top) -- 1950s (Top) -- 1960s (Top) -- 1970s (Top) -- 1980s (Top) -- 1990s (Top) -- 2000s (Top) -- 2010s (Top) ... >

Overview

The 1970s came and 1 Enoch was still in limbo. Not surprisingly, the only major studies of the period were Matthew Black's edition of the Greek fragments in 1970, and a translation in Modern Greek (1973).

The edition of the Qumran fragments by Józef T. Milik in 1976 reopened the research on 1 Enoch. In 1978 Michael Knibb published of a new edition of the Ethiopic text, which for the first time compared it with the newly founded fragments (Knibb 1978).

The late date of the Parables of Enoch advocated by Milik was sharply criticized by many scholars, who reiterated the importance of the document for the formation of early Christology. In his monograph in 1979 David Suter relocated the Parables of Enoch as a Second Temple Jewish document.

The interest in 1 Enoch was on the rise again. In 1979 Paolo Sacchi launched in Italy the journal Henoch.

Bibliography (articles)

1970

• Shlomo Pines. Eschatology and the Concept of Time in the Slavonic Book of Enoch. In Types of Redemption (1970 Werblowsky), edited volume, 72-87.

1971

• Józef T. Milik. Fragments grecs du livre d'Hénoch: P.Oxy. XVII 2069. In Chronique d'Egypte 46 (1971) 321-343. <French>

• Józef T. Milik. Problèmes de la littérature hénochique à la lumière des fragments araméens de Qumrân. In Harvard Theological Review 64.2-3 (1971) 333-378. <French>

• Karlheinz Müller. Beobachtungen zur Entwicklung der Menschensohnvorstellung in den Bilderreden des Henoch und im Buche Daniel. In Wegzeichen; Festgabe zum 60. Geburtstag von Prof. Dr. Hermenegild M. Biedermann. Hrsg. von Ernst Chr. Suttner und Coelestin Patock. Würzburg: Augustinus-Verlag, 1971. <German>

• Ath. Theocharis. The Idea of Sophia in the Ethiopic Henoch. In Bulletin of Biblical Studies/ΔΕΛΤΙΟΝ ΒΙΒΛΙΚΩΝ ΜΕΛΕΤΩΝ 1 (1971-72) 287-311.

1972

• Marc Philonenko. Une citation manichéenne du livre d'Hénoch. In Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses 52 (1972) 337-340. <French>

1978

• William Adler. Enoch in Early Christian Literature. In Society of Biblical Literature 1978 Seminar Papers (1978 Achtemeier), edited volume, 271-275.

• Martha Himmelfarb. A Report on Enoch in Rabbinic Literature. In Society of Biblical Literature 1978 Seminar Papers (1978 Achtemeier), edited volume, 259-269.

• David W. Suter. Apocalyptic Patterns in the Similitudes of Enoch. In Society of Biblical Literature 1978 Seminar Papers, One Hundred Fourteenth Annual Meeting 18-21 November 1978; Marriott and Monteleone Hotels, New Orleans, Louisiana / Achtemeier Paul J. - Montana : Scholars Press, 1978. - p.1-13.

1979

• Michael A. Knibb. The Date of the Parables of Enoch: A Critical Review. In NTS 25 (1979) 345-359.

• Christopher L. Mearns. Dating the Similitudes of Enoch. In New Testament Studies 25 (1979) 360-69.

• Paolo Sacchi. Il Libro dei Vigilanti e l'apocalittica. In Henoch 1 (1979) 42-98. <Italian>

• David W. Suter. Fallen Angel, Fallen Priest: The Problem of Family Purity in 1 Enoch 6-16. In Hebrew Union College Annual 50 (1979) 115-135.