Difference between revisions of "Category:Enochic Studies--1800s"

From 4 Enoch: : The Online Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, and Christian and Islamic Origins
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background:transparent;"
{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background:transparent;"
{{WindowMain
{{WindowMain
  |title= [[Main Page]] -> [[Enochic Studies]] (ES) -> [[:Category:1800s|1800s]]  
  |title= [[Enochic Studies]] ([[1800s]])
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |logo= history.png
  |logo= history.png
  |px= 38
  |px= 38
  |content=
  |content= [[File:Enoch Blake.jpg|500px]]
 
The page: '''Enochic Studies--1800s''', includes (in chronological order) scholarly and literary works in the field of Enochic Studies, made in the [[1800s|first half of the 19th century]], or between 1800 and 1849.
 
[[File:Angelo Mai.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Angelo Mai]]]]
[[File:Daniele Manin.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Daniele Manin]]]]
}}
}}


{{WindowMain
{{WindowMain
  |title= [[Enochic Studies|ES]] [[:Category:1800s|1800s]] -- History of research -- Overview
  |title= Highlights ([[1800s]])
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |logo = contents.png
  |logo = contents.png
  |px= 38
  |px= 38
  |content=
  |content=
[[File:Angelo Mai.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Angelo Mai]]]]
* [[Degli Egregori (On the Watchers / 1820 Manin), book]]
[[File:Daniele Manin.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Daniele Manin]]]]
* [[The Book of Enoch (1821 Laurence), book]]
 
* [[Libri Enoch prophetae versio aethiopica (1838 Laurence), book]]
[[Silvestre de Salcy]] was the first scholar to publish a translation (in Latin) of portions of the Paris manuscript of 1 Enoch, with notes in French (1800). His notes were translated into German in 1801 by [[Friedrich Theodor Rink]].
 
The "rediscovery" of the Ethiopic text deprived the Enoch Fragments of Syncellus of the centrality they had for two centuries in the early Enoch scholarship. [[Daniele Manin]]'s commentary in 1820 was the last one based on the Enoch Fragments of Syncellus; it remains a testament to two centuries of scholarship on 1 Enoch based on the available Greek, Latin, and Hebrew sources before the recovery of the Ethiopic text, and an even more impressive accomplishment when one considers that the would-be renowned Venetian patriot and statesman, and future president of the reborn Republic of Venice in 1848-49, was then barely sixteen years old.
 
In 1821 Richard Laurence published the first English translation of the whole 1 Enoch, followed by the editio princeps of the Ethiopic text in 1838. Both works were based on the manuscript at the Bodleian Library. In 1831-33 Eduard Rüppell’s expedition to Ethiopia produced Germany’s first exemplar of the book at the Stadtbibliothek in Frankfurt am Main. Two German translations (Hoffmann, 1833-38; and Clemens, 1850) and a Latin translation (Gfrörer, 1840), contributed to make the book available to the scholarly community.
 
In the 1820s, Angelo Mai purchased the Enoch manuscript that belonged to the Antonelli Library and made it available for study at the Vatican Library. Mai also published in1844 a new Greek fragment of 1 Enoch he had discovered at the Vatican Library.
 
In the 1830s and early 1840s, the character of Enoch held a prominent place in the revelations of Joseph Smith, the founder of the Latter-Day Saint movement. In the Life of Moses (6-7) Enoch is introduced as a prophet of repentance, a seer, and the builder of a city "that was called the City of Holiness, even Zion" (7:19). It was the last major development of the character of Enoch in a religious context.
 
In Enoch Restitutus (London, 1836) the Anglican clergyman Edward Murray suggested that the now published book of Henoch should be seen only as a corrupted version of the “original” mentioned by the Letter of Jude and other ancient authors. It was the final and failed attempt to harmonize the Hermetic tradition of the antiquity of Henoch-Hermes and his writings with the new discoveries. Murray’s book was poorly received; a tradition that for centuries had been at the center of scholarly debate suddenly appeared a worthless, fanciful theory with no legitimacy in Enochic scholarship.
 
@2014 Gabriele Boccaccini, University of Michigan
}}
}}


{{WindowMain
{{WindowMain
  |title= ES 1800s -- Highlights
  |title= [[Interpreters]] ([[1800s]])
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |logo = contents.png
  |logo = contents.png
  |px= 38
  |px= 38
  |content=
  |content=
* [[Degli Egregori (On the Watchers / 1820 Manin), book]]
* [[Silvestre de Salcy]]
* [[The Book of Enoch (1821 Laurence), book]]
* [[Daniele Manin]]
* [[Libri Enoch prophetae versio aethiopica (1838 Laurence), book]]
* [[Richard Laurence]]
* [[Edward Murray]]
}}
}}


Line 51: Line 44:
| style="width:35%; border:1px solid #a7d7f9; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top; padding: 5px 10px 10px 8px; -moz-border-radius: 10px; -webkit-border-radius: 10px; border-radius:10px;"|
| style="width:35%; border:1px solid #a7d7f9; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top; padding: 5px 10px 10px 8px; -moz-border-radius: 10px; -webkit-border-radius: 10px; border-radius:10px;"|
{| id="mp-right" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff; background:transparent;"
{| id="mp-right" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff; background:transparent;"
{{WindowMain
{{WindowMain
  |title= ES [[Timeline]]
  |title= [[Timeline]] ([[1800s]])
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |logo= history.png
  |logo= history.png
  |px= 38
  |px= 38
  |content=
  |content= [[File:1800s.jpg|thumb|left|250px]]
 
'''''[[Enochic Studies]]''''' : [[:Category:Enochic Studies--2020s|2020s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--2010s|2010s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--2000s|2000s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1990s|1990s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1980s|1980s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1970s|1970s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1960s|1960s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1950s|1950s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1940s|1940s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1930s|1930s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1920s|1920s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1910s|1910s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1900s|1900s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1850s|1850s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1800s|1800s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1700s|1700s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1600s|1600s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1500s|1500s]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1450s|1450s]] -- [[Enochic Studies|Home]]
 
'''''[[Timeline]]''''' : [[2020s]] -- [[2010s]] -- [[2000s]] -- [[1990s]] -- [[1980s]] -- [[1970s]] -- [[1960s]] -- [[1950s]] -- [[1940s]] -- [[1930s]] -- [[1920s]] -- [[1910s]] -- [[1900s]] -- [[1850s]] -- [[1800s]] -- [[1700s]] -- [[1600s]] -- [[1500s]] -- [[1450s]] -- [[Medieval]] -- [[Timeline|Home]]
}}
}}


{{WindowMain
{{WindowMain
  |title= [[Enochic Scholars & Authors|ES Scholars & Authors]]
  |title= [[Languages]]  
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
  |logo= history.png
  |logo= contents.png
  |px= 38
  |px= 38
  |content=
  |content= [[File:Languages.jpg|thumb|left|250px]]
 
'''[[Enochic Studies]]''' : [[:Category:Enochic Studies--English|English]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--French|French]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--German|German]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--Italian|Italian]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--Latin|Latin]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--Spanish|Spanish]] -/- [[Enochic Studies|Other]]
}}
}}
|}
|}


==History of Research (1800s) -- Notes ==


[[Silvestre de Salcy]] was the first scholar to publish a translation (in Latin) of portions of the Paris manuscript of 1 Enoch, with notes in French (1800). His notes were translated into German in 1801 by [[Friedrich Theodor Rink]].


{{WindowMain
The "rediscovery" of the Ethiopic text deprived the Enoch Fragments of Syncellus of the centrality they had for two centuries in the early Enoch scholarship. [[Daniele Manin]]'s commentary in 1820 was the last one based on the Enoch Fragments of Syncellus; it remains a testament to two centuries of scholarship on 1 Enoch based on the available Greek, Latin, and Hebrew sources before the recovery of the Ethiopic text, and an even more impressive accomplishment when one considers that the would-be renowned Venetian patriot and statesman, and future president of the reborn Republic of Venice in 1848-49, was then barely sixteen years old.
|title= [[:Category:Enochic Studies--Fiction|ES Fiction]]
|backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
|logo= history.png
|px= 38
|content=
}}


In 1821 Richard Laurence published the first English translation of the whole 1 Enoch, followed by the editio princeps of the Ethiopic text in 1838. Both works were based on the manuscript at the Bodleian Library. In 1831-33 Eduard Rüppell’s expedition to Ethiopia produced Germany’s first exemplar of the book at the Stadtbibliothek in Frankfurt am Main. Two German translations (Hoffmann, 1833-38; and Clemens, 1850) and a Latin translation (Gfrörer, 1840), contributed to make the book available to the scholarly community.


{{WindowMain
In the 1820s, Angelo Mai purchased the Enoch manuscript that belonged to the Antonelli Library and made it available for study at the Vatican Library. Mai also published in 1844 a new Greek fragment of 1 Enoch he had discovered at the Vatican Library.
|title= Cognate Fields ([[:Category:1800s|1800s]])
|backgroundLogo= Bluebg_rounded_croped.png
|logo= contents.png
|px= 38
|content= [[File:Fields research.jpg|250px]]


[[:Category:Second Temple Studies--1800s|Second Temple Studies]] -- [[:Category:Enochic Studies--1800s|Enochic Studies]] -- [[:Category:Apocalyptic Studies--1800s|Apocalyptic Studies]] -- [[:Category:OT Apocrypha Studies--1800s|OT Apocrypha Studies]] -- [[:Category:Wisdom Studies--1800s|Wisdom Studies]] -- [[:Category:OT Pseudepigrapha Studies--1800s|OT Pseudepigrapha Studies]] -- [[:Category:Hellenistic-Jewish Studies--1800s|Hellenistic-Jewish Studies]] -- [[:Category:Philo Studies--1800s|Philo Studies]] -- [[:Category:Josephus Studies--1800s|Josephus Studies]] -- [[:Category:Historical Jesus Studies--1800s|Historical Jesus Studies]] -- [[:Category:Pauline Studies--1800s|Pauline Studies]] -- [[:Category:Johannine Studies--1800s|Johannine Studies]] -- [[:Category:Petrine Studies--1800s|Petrine Studies]] -- [[:Category:Gospels Studies--1800s|Gospels Studies]] -- [[:Category:Christian Origins Studies--1800s|Christian Origins Studies]] -- [[:Category:New Testament Studies--1800s|New Testament Studies]] -- [[:Category:Early Christian Studies--1800s|Early Christian Studies]] -- [[:Category:Early Jewish Studies--1800s|Early Jewish Studies]] -- [[:Category:Early Islamic Studies--1800s|Early Islamic Studies]] -- [[:Category:Early Samaritan Studies--1800s|Early Samaritan Studies]] -- [[:Category:Hebrew Bible Studies--1800s|Hebrew Bible Studies]]
In the 1830s and early 1840s, the character of Enoch held a prominent place in the revelations of Joseph Smith, the founder of the Latter-Day Saint movement. In the Life of Moses (6-7) Enoch is introduced as a prophet of repentance, a seer, and the builder of a city "that was called the City of Holiness, even Zion" (7:19). It was the last major development of the character of Enoch in a religious context.
}}
|}
|}


In Enoch Restitutus (London, 1836) the Anglican clergyman Edward Murray suggested that the now published book of Henoch should be seen only as a corrupted version of the “original” mentioned by the Letter of Jude and other ancient authors. It was the final and failed attempt to harmonize the Hermetic tradition of the antiquity of Henoch-Hermes and his writings with the new discoveries. Murray’s book was poorly received; a tradition that for centuries had been at the center of scholarly debate suddenly appeared a worthless, fanciful theory with no legitimacy in Enochic scholarship.


@2014 Gabriele Boccaccini, University of Michigan


==Selected Articles==
== Selected Articles (1800s) ==


* [[Moses Stuart]]. ''Christology of the Book of Enoch, with an Account of the Book Itself, and Critical Remarks upon It''. In [[American Biblical Repository]] 3 (1840) 86-137. [A presentation of the newly discovered document to the American audience, with emphasis in the Christology of 1 Enoch].
* [[Moses Stuart]]. ''Christology of the Book of Enoch, with an Account of the Book Itself, and Critical Remarks upon It''. In [[American Biblical Repository]] 3 (1840) 86-137. [A presentation of the newly discovered document to the American audience, with emphasis in the Christology of 1 Enoch].
* "The Apocryphal Book of Enoch," ''The Latter-day Saints' Millennial Star'', Vol. 1, No. 3 (July 1840): 61-62


* [[Samuel Davidson]]. ''Enoch'' & ''Enoch, Book of''. In [[A Cyclopaedia of Biblical Literature (1845 Kitto), edited volume]], 629-634. [Samuel Davidson was then Professor of Biblical Literature and Oriental languages in the Lancashire Independent College].
* [[Samuel Davidson]]. ''Enoch'' & ''Enoch, Book of''. In [[A Cyclopaedia of Biblical Literature (1845 Kitto), edited volume]], 629-634. [Samuel Davidson was then Professor of Biblical Literature and Oriental languages in the Lancashire Independent College].

Latest revision as of 14:33, 19 December 2019

Enoch Blake.jpg

The page: Enochic Studies--1800s, includes (in chronological order) scholarly and literary works in the field of Enochic Studies, made in the first half of the 19th century, or between 1800 and 1849.


Highlights (1800s)
Highlights (1800s)



1800s.jpg

Enochic Studies : 2020s -- 2010s -- 2000s -- 1990s -- 1980s -- 1970s -- 1960s -- 1950s -- 1940s -- 1930s -- 1920s -- 1910s -- 1900s -- 1850s -- 1800s -- 1700s -- 1600s -- 1500s -- 1450s -- Home

Timeline : 2020s -- 2010s -- 2000s -- 1990s -- 1980s -- 1970s -- 1960s -- 1950s -- 1940s -- 1930s -- 1920s -- 1910s -- 1900s -- 1850s -- 1800s -- 1700s -- 1600s -- 1500s -- 1450s -- Medieval -- Home


History of Research (1800s) -- Notes

Silvestre de Salcy was the first scholar to publish a translation (in Latin) of portions of the Paris manuscript of 1 Enoch, with notes in French (1800). His notes were translated into German in 1801 by Friedrich Theodor Rink.

The "rediscovery" of the Ethiopic text deprived the Enoch Fragments of Syncellus of the centrality they had for two centuries in the early Enoch scholarship. Daniele Manin's commentary in 1820 was the last one based on the Enoch Fragments of Syncellus; it remains a testament to two centuries of scholarship on 1 Enoch based on the available Greek, Latin, and Hebrew sources before the recovery of the Ethiopic text, and an even more impressive accomplishment when one considers that the would-be renowned Venetian patriot and statesman, and future president of the reborn Republic of Venice in 1848-49, was then barely sixteen years old.

In 1821 Richard Laurence published the first English translation of the whole 1 Enoch, followed by the editio princeps of the Ethiopic text in 1838. Both works were based on the manuscript at the Bodleian Library. In 1831-33 Eduard Rüppell’s expedition to Ethiopia produced Germany’s first exemplar of the book at the Stadtbibliothek in Frankfurt am Main. Two German translations (Hoffmann, 1833-38; and Clemens, 1850) and a Latin translation (Gfrörer, 1840), contributed to make the book available to the scholarly community.

In the 1820s, Angelo Mai purchased the Enoch manuscript that belonged to the Antonelli Library and made it available for study at the Vatican Library. Mai also published in 1844 a new Greek fragment of 1 Enoch he had discovered at the Vatican Library.

In the 1830s and early 1840s, the character of Enoch held a prominent place in the revelations of Joseph Smith, the founder of the Latter-Day Saint movement. In the Life of Moses (6-7) Enoch is introduced as a prophet of repentance, a seer, and the builder of a city "that was called the City of Holiness, even Zion" (7:19). It was the last major development of the character of Enoch in a religious context.

In Enoch Restitutus (London, 1836) the Anglican clergyman Edward Murray suggested that the now published book of Henoch should be seen only as a corrupted version of the “original” mentioned by the Letter of Jude and other ancient authors. It was the final and failed attempt to harmonize the Hermetic tradition of the antiquity of Henoch-Hermes and his writings with the new discoveries. Murray’s book was poorly received; a tradition that for centuries had been at the center of scholarly debate suddenly appeared a worthless, fanciful theory with no legitimacy in Enochic scholarship.

@2014 Gabriele Boccaccini, University of Michigan

Selected Articles (1800s)

  • Moses Stuart. Christology of the Book of Enoch, with an Account of the Book Itself, and Critical Remarks upon It. In American Biblical Repository 3 (1840) 86-137. [A presentation of the newly discovered document to the American audience, with emphasis in the Christology of 1 Enoch].
  • "The Apocryphal Book of Enoch," The Latter-day Saints' Millennial Star, Vol. 1, No. 3 (July 1840): 61-62