Talk:2020 Aramaic Enoch Conference - Revision history

Gabriele Boccaccini at 18:54, 22 October 2020

2020-10-22T18:54:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 22 October 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	3. While describing a situation of corruption and decay on earth as the result of the rebellion on heaven, there was no plan of escape. Enochic Judaism was a "theology of compliant". They lamented the corruption of the universe, but they offered no way-out, except in a new creation at the end of times. They were resigned to living in an evil world. There was no alternative Enochic halakhah for this world, no purity code, no Enochic torah. All hope of redemption was postponed to the end of time; this world is rluled by evil forces. An yet, regardless of how hard if might be, in the judgment humans will be accountable according to their deeds. The Enochians were not competing with Moses-- they were just complaining.		3. While describing a situation of corruption and decay on earth as the result of the rebellion on heaven, there was no plan of escape. Enochic Judaism was a "theology of compliant". They lamented the corruption of the universe, but they offered no way-out, except in a new creation at the end of times. They were resigned to living in an evil world. There was no alternative Enochic halakhah for this world, no purity code, no Enochic torah. All hope of redemption was postponed to the end of time; this world is rluled by evil forces. An yet, regardless of how hard if might be, in the judgment humans will be accountable according to their deeds. The Enochians were not competing with Moses-- they were just complaining.

	4. Enoch traditions played a central role in Qumran (the calendrical and cultic controversies of the Qumran community had their antecedent in the Enochic controversies. Their roots wer ein the same traditions of dissent that had challenged th epower of the Zadokte priesthood. They never show any nostalgia for the time when the House of ~~Z=adok~~ was in ~~werThere~~ is a significant difference, however. Starting with Jubilees, Enochic traditions were combined with Mosaic traditions in order to create a distinctive halakha that since creation ~~has~~ protected the chosen people from the power of evil, and will do it until the end of time, provided the Israel follows the right halakha (the right calendar, the right ), what the majority of people apparently ~~are~~ not doing.		4. Enoch traditions played a central role in Qumran (the calendrical and cultic controversies of the Qumran community had their antecedent in the Enochic controversies. Their roots wer ein the same traditions of dissent that had challenged th epower of the Zadokte priesthood. They never show any nostalgia for the time when the House of Zadok was in power, nor did they

			There is a significant difference, however. Starting with Jubilees, Enochic traditions were combined with Mosaic traditions in order to create a distinctive halakha that since creation protected the chosen people from the power of evil, and will do it until the end of time, provided the Israel follows the right halakha (the right calendar, the right ), what the majority of people apparently were not doing. ...

	5. The Enochic tradition continued its way, unaffected by the way in which the Qumran		5. The Enochic tradition continued its way, unaffected by the way in which the Qumran

Gabriele Boccaccini at 17:47, 22 October 2020

2020-10-22T17:47:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 22 October 2020
Line 43:		Line 43:

	This year the Enoch Seminar celebrates 20 years of activity. It was born in the year 2000 as an attempt to bring together all the major international specialists of Second Temple Judaism and in particular of Jewish Apocalypticism. Our first meeting in Florence in 2001 was on the origins of Enochic Judaism.		This year the Enoch Seminar celebrates 20 years of activity. It was born in the year 2000 as an attempt to bring together all the major international specialists of Second Temple Judaism and in particular of Jewish Apocalypticism. Our first meeting in Florence in 2001 was on the origins of Enochic Judaism.
	Our second meeting in 2003 was in Venice on "Enoch and Qumran Origins". Many of us ~~were there~~: foem Lawrence Schiffam, to Jim Vanderkam, Torleif Elgvin, Ida Froelich, Corrado martone, Loren Stuckenbruck, Eibert Tigchelaar, Liliana Rosso Ubibli, and myself		Our second meeting in 2003 was in Venice on "Enoch and Qumran Origins".
			When The proceedings of our onine conference will be published, we will see the progress that the program that has been made in these last 17 years.

			Many of us has attended both conferences: foem Lawrence Schiffam, to Jim Vanderkam, Torleif Elgvin, Ida Froelich, Corrado martone, Loren Stuckenbruck, Eibert Tigchelaar, Liliana Rosso Ubibli, and myself. It would be interesting to see how our ideas have changed or progressed.

	Among the speakers of the Venice conference in 2003 were also George Nickelsburg, Paolo Sacchi. Florentino garcia martinez, Helge Kvanvig, Shemariahu Talmon, Michael Knibb, Hanan Eshel, Klaus Koch, Emile Puech, who so much have contributed to the study of Aramaic Enoch.		Among the speakers of the Venice conference in 2003 were also George Nickelsburg, Paolo Sacchi. Florentino garcia martinez, Helge Kvanvig, Shemariahu Talmon, Michael Knibb, Hanan Eshel, Klaus Koch, Emile Puech, who so much have contributed to the study of Aramaic Enoch.

	We as scholars, and the Enoch Seminar as an organization, would not even exist without the memory of the past and the commitment to building the new generation of specialists in Second Temple Judaism. We are all closely related to each other. Being part of this collective history is a privilege and a responsibility. As scholars, we do not live isolated from the world and untouched by the evil of this world. But we will all be measured by the courage and determination with which we adapt to even the most difficult challenges and promote a climate of inclusiveness and friendship. Stay tuned, my friends: the best is yet to come.		We as scholars, and the Enoch Seminar as an organization, would not even exist without the memory of the past and the commitment to building the new generation of specialists in Second Temple Judaism. We are all closely related to each other. Being part of this collective history is a privilege and a responsibility. As scholars, we do not live isolated from the world and untouched by the evil of this world. But we will all be measured by the courage and determination with which we adapt to even the most difficult challenges and promote a climate of inclusiveness and friendship. Stay tuned, my friends: the best is yet to come.

Gabriele Boccaccini at 17:31, 22 October 2020

2020-10-22T17:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 22 October 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	4. Enoch traditions played a central role in Qumran (the calendrical and cultic controversies of the Qumran community had their antecedent in the Enochic controversies. Their roots wer ein the same traditions of dissent that had challenged th epower of the Zadokte priesthood. They never show any nostalgia for the time when the House of Z=adok was in werThere is a significant difference, however. Starting with Jubilees, Enochic traditions were combined with Mosaic traditions in order to create a distinctive halakha that since creation has protected the chosen people from the power of evil, and will do it until the end of time, provided the Israel follows the right halakha (the right calendar, the right ), what the majority of people apparently are not doing.		4. Enoch traditions played a central role in Qumran (the calendrical and cultic controversies of the Qumran community had their antecedent in the Enochic controversies. Their roots wer ein the same traditions of dissent that had challenged th epower of the Zadokte priesthood. They never show any nostalgia for the time when the House of Z=adok was in werThere is a significant difference, however. Starting with Jubilees, Enochic traditions were combined with Mosaic traditions in order to create a distinctive halakha that since creation has protected the chosen people from the power of evil, and will do it until the end of time, provided the Israel follows the right halakha (the right calendar, the right ), what the majority of people apparently are not doing.

	5. The Enochic tradition continued its way,		5. The Enochic tradition continued its way, unaffected by the way in which the Qumran
	I understand that ~~waht~~ we know is only a limited fraction of what only a limited amount of the scrolls at the Qumran, but the fact that the more recent Enochic traditions are not preserved at Qumran seemed to me too ~~conspicuos~~ as to be merely accidental. In any case, the most recent books of Enoch continue to present quite uncompromisingly a theology of complaint in which there is no way-out but in the establishment of the world to come and the coming of the Messiah Son of Man as the final judge and destroyer of evil.		I understand that what we know is only a limited fraction of what only a limited amount of the scrolls at the Qumran, but the fact that the more recent Enochic traditions are not preserved at Qumran seemed to me too conspicuous as to be merely accidental. This is certainly true for the Parables of Enoch but also for the section in the Epistle of Enoch (1 En 94:6 to 104:6) which even some internal elements seems to indicate to be a later interpolation of the texts. The text presents a series of three admonitions In fact when this section is eliminated the Enochic texts regains its consistency,

			In any case, the most recent books of Enoch continue to present quite uncompromisingly a theology of complaint in which there is no way-out but in the establishment of the world to come and the coming of the Messiah Son of Man as the final judge and destroyer of evil.

Gabriele Boccaccini at 16:34, 22 October 2020

2020-10-22T16:34:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 22 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			It is difficult to offer a summary of such a rich conference. I must say that I enjoy immensely specialized conferences where all participants are specialists in the field and have a common passion about the field. We came from many different countries and have different approaches, interests and methods of inquiry, but we all united by the same passion. We all love Enoch. The online format has allowed us to gather all together from all corners of the globe and, surprise, surprise!, we are not a small group.

			As a scholar of intellectual history, I would like to focus of 5 conclusions, which in now ways I claim they represent the general view shared by all participants at this conference. They represent my own conclusions.

			1. The Enoch tradition started after the Babylonian exile in parallel with the consolidation of the Mosaic priestly tradition of the Torah. The Enochic scribes recycled some ancient mythological narratives by giving them a local (cultural, religious & geographical) flavor. We still struggle to understand the mechanism of transmission of these traditions and knowledges, especially from Babylon to the land of Israel. but I think that all papers have solidly affirmed such a connection and offered some interesting indications on how these traditions were transmitted or at least pushes us to pursue such a path of research.

			2. Since the beginning Enochic traditions were characterized by a distinctive emphasis on the supernatural origin of evil (which I would affirm as the central generative idea of Enochic Judaism) as well as by a controversy against the Jerusalem temple and priesthood. In this sense Enochic Judaism can be characterized as a distintive form of Judaism, different from and alternative to Zadokite Judaism.

			3. While describing a situation of corruption and decay on earth as the result of the rebellion on heaven, there was no plan of escape. Enochic Judaism was a "theology of compliant". They lamented the corruption of the universe, but they offered no way-out, except in a new creation at the end of times. They were resigned to living in an evil world. There was no alternative Enochic halakhah for this world, no purity code, no Enochic torah. All hope of redemption was postponed to the end of time; this world is rluled by evil forces. An yet, regardless of how hard if might be, in the judgment humans will be accountable according to their deeds. The Enochians were not competing with Moses-- they were just complaining.

			4. Enoch traditions played a central role in Qumran (the calendrical and cultic controversies of the Qumran community had their antecedent in the Enochic controversies. Their roots wer ein the same traditions of dissent that had challenged th epower of the Zadokte priesthood. They never show any nostalgia for the time when the House of Z=adok was in werThere is a significant difference, however. Starting with Jubilees, Enochic traditions were combined with Mosaic traditions in order to create a distinctive halakha that since creation has protected the chosen people from the power of evil, and will do it until the end of time, provided the Israel follows the right halakha (the right calendar, the right ), what the majority of people apparently are not doing.

			5. The Enochic tradition continued its way,
			I understand that waht we know is only a limited fraction of what only a limited amount of the scrolls at the Qumran, but the fact that the more recent Enochic traditions are not preserved at Qumran seemed to me too conspicuos as to be merely accidental. In any case, the most recent books of Enoch continue to present quite uncompromisingly a theology of complaint in which there is no way-out but in the establishment of the world to come and the coming of the Messiah Son of Man as the final judge and destroyer of evil.






			=====





	It is always difficult to find the right words to conclude a conference and in particular, such a successful conference as the one we have experienced in these last three days.		It is always difficult to find the right words to conclude a conference and in particular, such a successful conference as the one we have experienced in these last three days.

Gabriele Boccaccini at 01:49, 22 October 2020

2020-10-22T01:49:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 22 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:

	It is always difficult to find the right words to conclude a conference and in particular, ~~suc~~ a ~~Successful~~ conference as the one we have experienced in these last ~~thrte~~ days.		It is always difficult to find the right words to conclude a conference and in particular, such a successful conference as the one we have experienced in these last three days.

	Our conference was planned originally as a conference at the University of Lublin, Poland. COVID-19 forced us to go online. We have entered a new era in which this kind of meetings will become more and more frequent. I think we have proven, once again, that it can be done, and can be done successful . We have brought together specialists for all around the world. The current crisis will not end soon. Our next colloquium in November on the Gospel of Matthew will be online, and so will be our on John the Baptist in January, the next Enoch Graduate Seminar at the end of April, and the international Conference on Apocalypticism in late May, celebrating the two-hundredth anniversary of the publication of the first English translation of 1 Enoch in English		Our conference was planned originally as a conference at the University of Lublin, Poland. COVID-19 forced us to go online. We have entered a new era in which this kind of meetings will become more and more frequent. I think we have proven, once again, that it can be done, and can be done successful . We have brought together specialists for all around the world. The current crisis will not end soon. Our next colloquium in November on the Gospel of Matthew will be online, and so will be our on John the Baptist in January, the next Enoch Graduate Seminar at the end of April, and the international Conference on Apocalypticism in late May, celebrating the two-hundredth anniversary of the publication of the first English translation of 1 Enoch in English

Gabriele Boccaccini at 01:44, 22 October 2020

2020-10-22T01:44:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 22 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This year the Enoch Seminar celebrates 20 years of activity. It was born in the year 2000 as an attempt to bring together all the major international specialists of Second Temple Judaism and in particular of Jewish Apocalypticism. We chose the name Enoch Seminar, since George Nickelsburg’s commentary was in the making and the study of Enoch literature was reshaping our view of ancient Jewish diversity. Our first meeting in Florence in 2001 was on the origins of Enochic Judaism.
	~~Our second meeting~~

	~~There was however another reason for calling ourselves~~ the ~~Enoch Seminar. We needed an ubiquitous character who did not belong~~ to ~~any particular corpus of ancient Jewish literature but was present everywhere (in the Old~~ and ~~New Testaments,~~ in ~~the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha~~, in the ~~Dead Sea Scrolls,~~ in the Church Fathers, rabbinic literature and the Koran). We wanted to get rid of all the traditional “canonical” boundaries, free to reshape the Jewish Literature of the Second Temple according to new categories.		It is always difficult to find the right words to conclude a conference and in particular, suc a Successful conference as the one we have experienced in these last thrte days.

	~~Over time the Enoch Seminar has grown considerably from~~ a ~~small group of scholars to a much larger and more diverse community, affiliated to~~ the ~~Society~~ of ~~Biblical Literature.~~		Our conference was planned originally as a conference at the University of Lublin, Poland. COVID-19 forced us to go online. We have entered a new era in which this kind of meetings will become more and more frequent. I think we have proven, once again, that it can be done, and can be done successful . We have brought together specialists for all around the world. The current crisis will not end soon. Our next colloquium in November on the Gospel of Matthew will be online, and so will be our on John the Baptist in January, the next Enoch Graduate Seminar at the end of April, and the international Conference on Apocalypticism in late May, celebrating the two-hundredth anniversary of the publication of the first English translation of 1 Enoch in English

	~~In 20 years the Enoch Seminar has organized more than 30 international meetings, published more than 20 volumes, and inspired many more books and articles by its members.~~
	~~At the beginning there were only the biennial Enoch Seminars, then came the Enoch Graduate Seminars, then the Nangeroni Meetings, then the Colloquia at the SBL~~, ~~and now the first online Conference~~.

	~~With the~~ COVID-19 ~~crisis we~~ have entered a new era in which this kind of meetings will become more and more frequent. I think we have proven that it can be done. We have brought together specialists for all around the world. The current crisis will not end soon. Our next colloquium in November on the Gospel of Matthew will be online, and so will our next Enoch Graduate Seminar.

	Even when we are able to resume our meetings in person, it will never be the same again. From now on, residential conferences will also have a larger online component. We have entered the cyberspace.		Even when we are able to resume our meetings in person, it will never be the same again. From now on, residential conferences will also have a larger online component. We have entered the cyberspace.

	At the end of these ~~four~~ days of conference, I would like to thank all the organizers: ~~Lorenzo DiTommaso, Kelley Bautch (it is always a privileged and a pleasure to work with you)~~, ~~Loren Stuckenbruck (~~who unfortunately could not be ~~present to our meeting but has contributed much to its organization), Jason Zurawski, Archie Wright, and Benjamin Reynolds. They have worked so hard for months to make this conference a success~~. I also would like to thank Lawrence Schiffman, Myriam Brand, ~~John Collins~~, ~~and James McGrath~~, who have attended all ~~four~~ days of the conference and contributed to the daily opening sessions~~. I would like to thank~~ Rodney Caruthers~~, Jackie Wyse-Rhodes~~ and Deborah Forger who facilitated the meeting of the graduate students~~, and the oditor of our website and newsletter, Jason von Ehrenkrook.~~		At the end of these three days of conference, I would like to thank all the organizers: first of all, Henryk Drawnel who unfortunately could not be with usa after all the work he did in organizing the event. I also would like to thank Lawrence Schiffman, Matthew Goff, Myriam Brand, James VanderKam, Gerbern Oegema, who have attended all three days of the conference and contributed to the daily opening sessions, as well as Rodney Caruthers and Deborah Forger who facilitated the meeting of the graduate students.

	I would like to thank all the panelists, the respondents, the discussants, those who contributed thru the chat, and all the almost 300 participants with an average of 100-150 attendees for each session. Many particpants sometimes heroically joined the sessions very late in the evening or very early in the morning and in some cases during the night.

	~~Special thanks go~~ to ~~our wonderful secretary (Joshua Scott)~~, ~~he made everything look so easy, while every day~~ and ~~every minute he was adjusting~~ the ~~program to our specific needs~~. ~~Our thanks also go to~~ the ~~Frankel Center for Judaic Studies,~~ the ~~Michigan Center for Early Christian Studies,~~ and the ~~Alessandro Nangeroni International Endowment for their continued support~~.		I would like to thank all the speakers, the chairs and all the many participants who with an average of 80-100 have attended each session. Many participants sometimes heroically joined the sessions very late in the evening or very early in the morning and in some cases during the night.

	In our ~~opening session we celebrated~~ the ~~work~~ of ~~Paolo Sacchi~~, ~~George Nickelburg, Robert Kraft, Michael Knibb~~, ~~Michael Stone~~ and ~~Devorah Dimant~~. ~~It was~~ a ~~wonderful reminder that we walk on the shoulders of the giants~~ who ~~preceded us.~~		Special thanks go to our wonderful secretary (Joshua Scott), he made everything look so easy, while every day and every minute he was adjusting the program to our specific needs. Our thanks go to the University of Lublin and the Enoch Seminar for organizing the event and to the Frankel Center for Judaic Studies, the Michigan Center for Early Christian Studies, and the Alessandro Nangeroni International Endowment for their continued support. And a special thanks to all those who have contributed with a donation

	~~The 4~~ Enoch ~~website provides a fascinating journey through~~ the ~~history~~ of ~~research in~~ Second Temple Judaism~~, from the time when Giovanni Pico della Mirandola began searching for the 70 secret books~~ of ~~Ezra at~~ the ~~end~~ of ~~the 15th century~~ and ~~Paul Eber wrote the first history~~ of ~~the Second Temple period in 1548.~~		This year the Enoch Seminar celebrates 20 years of activity. It was born in the year 2000 as an attempt to bring together all the major international specialists of Second Temple Judaism and in particular of Jewish Apocalypticism. Our first meeting in Florence in 2001 was on the origins of Enochic Judaism.
			Our second meeting in 2003 was in Venice on "Enoch and Qumran Origins". Many of us were there: foem Lawrence Schiffam, to Jim Vanderkam, Torleif Elgvin, Ida Froelich, Corrado martone, Loren Stuckenbruck, Eibert Tigchelaar, Liliana Rosso Ubibli, and myself

	~~We started our conference full of sadness over~~ the ~~death~~ of ~~James Dunn. Now that we are at~~ the ~~conclusion of such an important milestone as the first international online~~ conference on ~~Second temple Judaism~~, ~~I think it is most appropriate to remember with gratitude the late members of the Enoch Seminar: starting from~~ Hanan Eshel ~~and Shemaryahu Talmon, to Harold Ellens~~, Klaus Koch, ~~Michael Bonner, Geza Xeravits~~, ~~and Larry Hurtado. While we miss them~~ so much~~, we rejoice~~ to ~~see so many talented young women and men attending our seminar. We see in them~~ the ~~fulfilment~~ of ~~our commitment to building the new generation of specialists in Second Temple Judaism~~.		Among the speakers of the Venice conference in 2003 were also George Nickelsburg, Paolo Sacchi. Florentino garcia martinez, Helge Kvanvig, Shemariahu Talmon, Michael Knibb, Hanan Eshel, Klaus Koch, Emile Puech, who so much have contributed to the study of Aramaic Enoch.

	We as scholars, and the Enoch Seminar as an organization, would not even exist without the memory of the past. We are all closely related to each other. Being part of this collective history is a privilege and a responsibility. As scholars, we do not live isolated from the world and untouched by the evil of this world. But we will all be measured by the courage and determination with which we adapt to even the most difficult challenges and promote a climate of inclusiveness and friendship. Stay tuned, my friends: the best is yet to come.		We as scholars, and the Enoch Seminar as an organization, would not even exist without the memory of the past and the commitment to building the new generation of specialists in Second Temple Judaism. We are all closely related to each other. Being part of this collective history is a privilege and a responsibility. As scholars, we do not live isolated from the world and untouched by the evil of this world. But we will all be measured by the courage and determination with which we adapt to even the most difficult challenges and promote a climate of inclusiveness and friendship. Stay tuned, my friends: the best is yet to come.

Gabriele Boccaccini: Created page with "This year the Enoch Seminar celebrates 20 years of activity. It was born in the year 2000 as an attempt to bring together all the major international specialists of Second Tem..."

2020-10-21T23:41:29Z

Created page with "This year the Enoch Seminar celebrates 20 years of activity. It was born in the year 2000 as an attempt to bring together all the major international specialists of Second Tem..."

New page

This year the Enoch Seminar celebrates 20 years of activity. It was born in the year 2000 as an attempt to bring together all the major international specialists of Second Temple Judaism and in particular of Jewish Apocalypticism. We chose the name Enoch Seminar, since George Nickelsburg’s commentary was in the making and the study of Enoch literature was reshaping our view of ancient Jewish diversity. Our first meeting in Florence in 2001 was on the origins of Enochic Judaism.
Our second meeting

There was however another reason for calling ourselves the Enoch Seminar. We needed an ubiquitous character who did not belong to any particular corpus of ancient Jewish literature but was present everywhere (in the Old and New Testaments, in the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha, in the Dead Sea Scrolls, in the Church Fathers, rabbinic literature and the Koran). We wanted to get rid of all the traditional “canonical” boundaries, free to reshape the Jewish Literature of the Second Temple according to new categories.

Over time the Enoch Seminar has grown considerably from a small group of scholars to a much larger and more diverse community, affiliated to the Society of Biblical Literature.

In 20 years the Enoch Seminar has organized more than 30 international meetings, published more than 20 volumes, and inspired many more books and articles by its members.
At the beginning there were only the biennial Enoch Seminars, then came the Enoch Graduate Seminars, then the Nangeroni Meetings, then the Colloquia at the SBL, and now the first online Conference.

With the COVID-19 crisis we have entered a new era in which this kind of meetings will become more and more frequent. I think we have proven that it can be done. We have brought together specialists for all around the world. The current crisis will not end soon. Our next colloquium in November on the Gospel of Matthew will be online, and so will our next Enoch Graduate Seminar.

Even when we are able to resume our meetings in person, it will never be the same again. From now on, residential conferences will also have a larger online component. We have entered the cyberspace.

At the end of these four days of conference, I would like to thank all the organizers: Lorenzo DiTommaso, Kelley Bautch (it is always a privileged and a pleasure to work with you), Loren Stuckenbruck (who unfortunately could not be present to our meeting but has contributed much to its organization), Jason Zurawski, Archie Wright, and Benjamin Reynolds. They have worked so hard for months to make this conference a success. I also would like to thank Lawrence Schiffman, Myriam Brand, John Collins, and James McGrath, who have attended all four days of the conference and contributed to the daily opening sessions. I would like to thank Rodney Caruthers, Jackie Wyse-Rhodes and Deborah Forger who facilitated the meeting of the graduate students, and the oditor of our website and newsletter, Jason von Ehrenkrook.

I would like to thank all the panelists, the respondents, the discussants, those who contributed thru the chat, and all the almost 300 participants with an average of 100-150 attendees for each session. Many particpants sometimes heroically joined the sessions very late in the evening or very early in the morning and in some cases during the night.

Special thanks go to our wonderful secretary (Joshua Scott), he made everything look so easy, while every day and every minute he was adjusting the program to our specific needs. Our thanks also go to the Frankel Center for Judaic Studies, the Michigan Center for Early Christian Studies, and the Alessandro Nangeroni International Endowment for their continued support.

In our opening session we celebrated the work of Paolo Sacchi, George Nickelburg, Robert Kraft, Michael Knibb, Michael Stone and Devorah Dimant. It was a wonderful reminder that we walk on the shoulders of the giants who preceded us.

The 4 Enoch website provides a fascinating journey through the history of research in Second Temple Judaism, from the time when Giovanni Pico della Mirandola began searching for the 70 secret books of Ezra at the end of the 15th century and Paul Eber wrote the first history of the Second Temple period in 1548.

We started our conference full of sadness over the death of James Dunn. Now that we are at the conclusion of such an important milestone as the first international online conference on Second temple Judaism, I think it is most appropriate to remember with gratitude the late members of the Enoch Seminar: starting from Hanan Eshel and Shemaryahu Talmon, to Harold Ellens, Klaus Koch, Michael Bonner, Geza Xeravits, and Larry Hurtado. While we miss them so much, we rejoice to see so many talented young women and men attending our seminar. We see in them the fulfilment of our commitment to building the new generation of specialists in Second Temple Judaism.

We as scholars, and the Enoch Seminar as an organization, would not even exist without the memory of the past. We are all closely related to each other. Being part of this collective history is a privilege and a responsibility. As scholars, we do not live isolated from the world and untouched by the evil of this world. But we will all be measured by the courage and determination with which we adapt to even the most difficult challenges and promote a climate of inclusiveness and friendship. Stay tuned, my friends: the best is yet to come.