John son of Zebedee - Revision history

Gabriele Boccaccini: Redirected page to Category:John (subject)

2012-03-17T17:31:47Z

Redirected page to Category:John (subject)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 17 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*This page is edited by [[James E. West]], Quartz Hill School of Theology, United States of America.		#REDIRECT [[:Category:John (subject)]]
	*ANCIENT SOURCES: see [[John son of Zebedee (sources)]]
	*LIST OF SCHOLARLY AND FICTIONAL WORKS: see [[:Category:John (subject)]]


	'''John son of Zebedee''' (1st century CE) was, according to Christian tradition, one of the Twelve apostles of [[Jesus of Nazareth]] and one of the leaders of the early Church as well as one of the four evangelists.

	~~==Overview==~~

	~~'''''John'', son of Zebedee and brother of [[James son of Zebedee\|James]]''',~~

	~~...is mentioned in the Synoptic Gospels as one of the earliest disciples of Jesus, one of the Twelve, and his role is singled out in a few episodes of the [[Ministry of Jesus]].~~

	~~'''''John in the Gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke'''''~~

	Mark's mention of John the son of Zebedee is mimicked by Matthew and Luke, since, by all accounts and according to most scholars, Mark was the earliest of the Gospels written and Matthew and Luke made use of Mark and Q and added their own special material. The Synoptics, however, offer few details beyond the fact that John is the brother of James and that both are the sons of Zebedee. In Mark 3:17 Jesus calls James and John the 'sons of thunder' (Boanerges). This is a Hebrew or Aramaic phrase 'beney regesh' which the Gospel of Mark's author translates 'sons of thunder'. It is used in other contexts describing the striking of a house by lightning. But this solution is disputed. The phrase may also stem from 'beney ragaz' which means 'sons of wrath' or hot-tempered.

	~~'''''Act of the Apostles'''''~~

	In the [[Acts of the Apostles]] John is always mentioned in connection with Peter, except in Acts 12:2 where the death of James is discussed. In the mind of the author James, Peter, and John are apparently the most important of the Apostles as they are constantly referred to as taking the lead in many apostolic actions. Whether or not this was historically the case or is simply an example of the author's particular theological interest, we cannot now know. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that John is always mentioned in tandem with Peter while Peter is not always mentioned in tandem with John.

	~~'''''Galatians 2:9'''''~~

	This Pauline text is the only evidence outside of the Gospels and Acts for the existence of and importance of 'John' in the New Testament. Since he is here linked with James we are doubtless meant to assume that Paul has in mind Peter, and James and John the sons of Zebedee. Paul, however, offers no further information. Hence, the reference to John in Galatians is supplementary and confirmatory, but that's all.

	~~'''''John the son of Zebedee'''''~~

	... is traditionally identified with the [[Beloved Disciple]] of the [[Gospel of John\|Fourth Gospel]] and the [[John of Patmos]] of the book of Revelation. However, there is no reliable corroboration of these notions from extra-biblical sources and even the Bible itself never identifies either the [[Beloved Disciple]] nor the author of the Fourth Gospel. [[John of Patmos]], the author of [[Revelation]], also may, or may not be the son of Zebedee. Since our sources are not very specific about the patrimony of this author, suppositions concerning any putative connection to John son of Zebedee are speculative and nothing more. Therefore, it is unsafe to equate the author of Revelation with John the son of Zebedee, or the author of the Gospel of John or the Johannine epistles. More likely, it seems, is the belief that the Gospel and the Epistles and the Revelation all flow from a 'Johannine School' of theology. [[R. Alan Culpepepper]] is perhaps the best known representative of this line of thought.

	~~From the late second century comes the tradition that John miraculously escaped martyrdom and lived to old age in Ephesus. More than that cannot be known or asserted from available sources.~~

	~~==John in ancient sources==~~

	*See [[John son of Zebedee (sources)]]

	~~==John in scholarship==~~

	The tradition of the early Church naturally assumed a connection between John the son of Zebedee and the author of the Gospel of John and the Epistles of John and the Revelation. That presumption was assumed through the Reformation and up to the Age of Enlightenment. That era, though, saw a seismic shift in the way scholars (though not the general public) understood the identity of the author of the Gospels, epistles, and Revelation. It was during the Enlightenment that everything assumed was questioned- including and especially the authorship of every biblical text. John the son of Zebedee was no longer seen as the author of the anonymous Gospel; nor the Epistles which bore the name John, nor the final (and most disconcerting) New Testament book.

	It is not surprising, then, that the identification of John with the beloved disciple, and even more with [[John of Patmos]], is openly disputed in modern scholarship. What is surprising is how the scholarly guild seems to be retreating to something of a pre-Enlightenment point of view. Or at least some scholars have done. One of the most outspoken supporters of Johannine authorship of the Fourth Gospel, [[Richard Bauckham]], has recently suggested that John, the son of Zebedee, was in fact the author of that Gospel. In his 'Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony' (Eerdmans, 2006) Bauckham evaluates every bit of relevant evidence he can muster and concludes by asserting that, in the case of John's Gospel, the author was in fact that very John who was the son of Zebedee.

	Bauckham's work has tended to convince more conservatively oriented scholars but others have been less than impressed not to say remain unpersuaded. Nevertheless, on the question of Johannine authorship, no one has looked into the question more deeply than Bauckham.

	Similarly interested in the authorship of the Gospel and, more importantly, on the historical reliability of that Gospel, is the Society of Biblical Literature Section 'John, Jesus and History', - http://johannine.org/JJH.html - led by Tom Thatcher and Paul Anderson. Thatcher and Anderson and others have focused attention recently on the historical usefulness of John's Gospel. A herculean task, given the fact that most New Testament scholars have ignored John in favor of the Synoptics in their historical reconstructions of the life of Jesus of Nazareth.

	On the other end of the spectrum rests the work of Ben Witherington III, who has asserted in numerous publications that the author of the Fourth Gospel, and the 'Beloved Disciple', is Lazarus. The man whom Jesus raised from the dead. His views are available online here- http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/2007/01/was-lazarus-beloved-disciple.html Few have followed Witherington down this rather idiosyncratic path and so refuse to identify the 'Beloved Disciple' with Lazarus.

	~~==Select Bibliography==~~

	~~Smalley, Stephen S. ''John: Evangelist and Interpreter''. 2nd ed. 2nd ed. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1998.~~
	~~Kazmierski, Carl R. ''John the Baptist: Prophet and Evangelist''. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 1996.~~
	~~Pryor, John W. John, ''Evangelist of the Covenant People: The Narrative & Themes of the Fourth Gospel''. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press, 1992.~~

	~~==John in Fiction==~~

	The iconography of John developed into a narrative cycle, that went beyond the "biblical" data, including episodes from his old age. The same legendary elements are present in the novels and movies devoted to John the evangelist in modern times.

	~~One characteristically 'devotional' modern representation of the Apostle is found in [[The Gospel of John (2003 Saville), film]]. Per usual, the 'biography' of John follows traditional lines.~~

	~~==Related categories==~~

	*[[John of Patmos]] / [[Beloved Disciple]]
	*[[Jesus of Nazareth]] / [[Twelve Apostles]] / [[James son of Zebedee]]

	~~==External links==~~

	*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_the_Evangelist Wikipedia]


	[[Category:Index]]		[[Category:Index]]
	[[Category:People]]		[[Category:People]]

Gabriele Boccaccini: /* John in ancient sources */

2011-10-20T19:15:01Z

John in ancient sources

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 20 October 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:
	==John in ancient sources==		==John in ancient sources==

	*See [[John son of Zebedee]]		*See [[John son of Zebedee (sources)]]

	==John in scholarship==		==John in scholarship==

Gabriele Boccaccini: moved John to John son of Zebedee

2011-10-20T19:14:03Z

moved John to John son of Zebedee

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:14, 20 October 2011
(No difference)

Gabriele Boccaccini at 19:12, 20 October 2011

2011-10-20T19:12:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 20 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*This page is edited by [[James E. West]], Quartz Hill School of Theology, United States of America.		*This page is edited by [[James E. West]], Quartz Hill School of Theology, United States of America.
	*ANCIENT SOURCES: see [[John of Zebedee (sources)]]		*ANCIENT SOURCES: see [[John son of Zebedee (sources)]]
	*LIST OF SCHOLARLY AND FICTIONAL WORKS: see [[:Category:John (subject)]]		*LIST OF SCHOLARLY AND FICTIONAL WORKS: see [[:Category:John (subject)]]

Gabriele Boccaccini at 19:09, 20 October 2011

2011-10-20T19:09:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 20 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~#REDIRECT~~ [[:Category:John (subject)]]		*This page is edited by [[James E. West]], Quartz Hill School of Theology, United States of America.
			*ANCIENT SOURCES: see [[John of Zebedee (sources)]]
			*LIST OF SCHOLARLY AND FICTIONAL WORKS: see [[:Category:John (subject)]]


			'''John son of Zebedee''' (1st century CE) was, according to Christian tradition, one of the Twelve apostles of [[Jesus of Nazareth]] and one of the leaders of the early Church as well as one of the four evangelists.

			==Overview==

			'''''John'', son of Zebedee and brother of [[James son of Zebedee\|James]]''',

			...is mentioned in the Synoptic Gospels as one of the earliest disciples of Jesus, one of the Twelve, and his role is singled out in a few episodes of the [[Ministry of Jesus]].

			'''''John in the Gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke'''''

			Mark's mention of John the son of Zebedee is mimicked by Matthew and Luke, since, by all accounts and according to most scholars, Mark was the earliest of the Gospels written and Matthew and Luke made use of Mark and Q and added their own special material. The Synoptics, however, offer few details beyond the fact that John is the brother of James and that both are the sons of Zebedee. In Mark 3:17 Jesus calls James and John the 'sons of thunder' (Boanerges). This is a Hebrew or Aramaic phrase 'beney regesh' which the Gospel of Mark's author translates 'sons of thunder'. It is used in other contexts describing the striking of a house by lightning. But this solution is disputed. The phrase may also stem from 'beney ragaz' which means 'sons of wrath' or hot-tempered.

			'''''Act of the Apostles'''''

			In the [[Acts of the Apostles]] John is always mentioned in connection with Peter, except in Acts 12:2 where the death of James is discussed. In the mind of the author James, Peter, and John are apparently the most important of the Apostles as they are constantly referred to as taking the lead in many apostolic actions. Whether or not this was historically the case or is simply an example of the author's particular theological interest, we cannot now know. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that John is always mentioned in tandem with Peter while Peter is not always mentioned in tandem with John.

			'''''Galatians 2:9'''''

			This Pauline text is the only evidence outside of the Gospels and Acts for the existence of and importance of 'John' in the New Testament. Since he is here linked with James we are doubtless meant to assume that Paul has in mind Peter, and James and John the sons of Zebedee. Paul, however, offers no further information. Hence, the reference to John in Galatians is supplementary and confirmatory, but that's all.

			'''''John the son of Zebedee'''''

			... is traditionally identified with the [[Beloved Disciple]] of the [[Gospel of John\|Fourth Gospel]] and the [[John of Patmos]] of the book of Revelation. However, there is no reliable corroboration of these notions from extra-biblical sources and even the Bible itself never identifies either the [[Beloved Disciple]] nor the author of the Fourth Gospel. [[John of Patmos]], the author of [[Revelation]], also may, or may not be the son of Zebedee. Since our sources are not very specific about the patrimony of this author, suppositions concerning any putative connection to John son of Zebedee are speculative and nothing more. Therefore, it is unsafe to equate the author of Revelation with John the son of Zebedee, or the author of the Gospel of John or the Johannine epistles. More likely, it seems, is the belief that the Gospel and the Epistles and the Revelation all flow from a 'Johannine School' of theology. [[R. Alan Culpepepper]] is perhaps the best known representative of this line of thought.

			From the late second century comes the tradition that John miraculously escaped martyrdom and lived to old age in Ephesus. More than that cannot be known or asserted from available sources.

			==John in ancient sources==

			*See [[John son of Zebedee]]

			==John in scholarship==

			The tradition of the early Church naturally assumed a connection between John the son of Zebedee and the author of the Gospel of John and the Epistles of John and the Revelation. That presumption was assumed through the Reformation and up to the Age of Enlightenment. That era, though, saw a seismic shift in the way scholars (though not the general public) understood the identity of the author of the Gospels, epistles, and Revelation. It was during the Enlightenment that everything assumed was questioned- including and especially the authorship of every biblical text. John the son of Zebedee was no longer seen as the author of the anonymous Gospel; nor the Epistles which bore the name John, nor the final (and most disconcerting) New Testament book.

			It is not surprising, then, that the identification of John with the beloved disciple, and even more with [[John of Patmos]], is openly disputed in modern scholarship. What is surprising is how the scholarly guild seems to be retreating to something of a pre-Enlightenment point of view. Or at least some scholars have done. One of the most outspoken supporters of Johannine authorship of the Fourth Gospel, [[Richard Bauckham]], has recently suggested that John, the son of Zebedee, was in fact the author of that Gospel. In his 'Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony' (Eerdmans, 2006) Bauckham evaluates every bit of relevant evidence he can muster and concludes by asserting that, in the case of John's Gospel, the author was in fact that very John who was the son of Zebedee.

			Bauckham's work has tended to convince more conservatively oriented scholars but others have been less than impressed not to say remain unpersuaded. Nevertheless, on the question of Johannine authorship, no one has looked into the question more deeply than Bauckham.

			Similarly interested in the authorship of the Gospel and, more importantly, on the historical reliability of that Gospel, is the Society of Biblical Literature Section 'John, Jesus and History', - http://johannine.org/JJH.html - led by Tom Thatcher and Paul Anderson. Thatcher and Anderson and others have focused attention recently on the historical usefulness of John's Gospel. A herculean task, given the fact that most New Testament scholars have ignored John in favor of the Synoptics in their historical reconstructions of the life of Jesus of Nazareth.

			On the other end of the spectrum rests the work of Ben Witherington III, who has asserted in numerous publications that the author of the Fourth Gospel, and the 'Beloved Disciple', is Lazarus. The man whom Jesus raised from the dead. His views are available online here- http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/2007/01/was-lazarus-beloved-disciple.html Few have followed Witherington down this rather idiosyncratic path and so refuse to identify the 'Beloved Disciple' with Lazarus.

			==Select Bibliography==

			Smalley, Stephen S. ''John: Evangelist and Interpreter''. 2nd ed. 2nd ed. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1998.
			Kazmierski, Carl R. ''John the Baptist: Prophet and Evangelist''. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 1996.
			Pryor, John W. John, ''Evangelist of the Covenant People: The Narrative & Themes of the Fourth Gospel''. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press, 1992.

			==John in Fiction==

			The iconography of John developed into a narrative cycle, that went beyond the "biblical" data, including episodes from his old age. The same legendary elements are present in the novels and movies devoted to John the evangelist in modern times.

			One characteristically 'devotional' modern representation of the Apostle is found in [[The Gospel of John (2003 Saville), film]]. Per usual, the 'biography' of John follows traditional lines.

			==Related categories==

			*[[John of Patmos]] / [[Beloved Disciple]]
			*[[Jesus of Nazareth]] / [[Twelve Apostles]] / [[James son of Zebedee]]

			==External links==

			*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_the_Evangelist Wikipedia]


			[[Category:Index]]
			[[Category:People]]

Gabriele Boccaccini: Redirected page to Category:John (subject)

2010-08-16T00:51:11Z

Redirected page to Category:John (subject)

New page

#REDIRECT [[:Category:John (subject)]]